Kabaya'an
Kabaya'an is the political policy of promoting or protecting the interests of native and indigenous centered political and economic relationships within the geographic Ozeros Sea, based in the support of social, economic, cultural, and development based policies that benefit a certain set of nations.
Translated and better identified as Ozeroscentrism in scholarly fields, this ideological identity focuses more on specific forms of intercultural exchange and regionally locked interests rather than pressure towards certain political systems or economic models. Bodies that are analyzed as being vessels that promote this identity include the Association of Ozeros Nations, and the Vespanian Exchange Institute. The term itself is used by various scholarly bodies and political goups with distinct definitons and ideological implications.
By Country
Kabaya'an translates and presents itself in different ways depending on the national identity and internal political framework of the nation it is present within, however the following nations all host strong historical and contemporary trends of promoting Kabaya'an-centered policy and values.
Ankat
Template:Country data Bemirimitra Bemirimitra
Fahran
Pulacan
Pulau Keramat
Pulau Keramat, like Ankat, ties the ideological roots and origins of historical Kabaya'an identity to the post Mutulese Ochran period, as sentiment of solidarity in the post colonial architecture - especially given the development of foreign interests such as Arthurista immediately following the end of Mutulese colonial presence - was framed heavily by the two newly independent nations.
Pulau Keramat, and the academics that center themselves within the archipelago, have been seen as some of the earliest and most prolific efforts of expressing and promoting Kabaya'an, especially through internationally reaching bodies such as the Association of Ozeros Nations and the Vespanian Exchange Institute. The manner of how Pulau Keramat has interacted within its neighborhood, such as evidenced by its intervention in the Nkomo Accords and the Fahrani Civil War, indicates that a majority of international policy and interventionism by the archipelagic state is shaped by said policy values.
