CGTC v. Norfolk Southern: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Maltropia moved page CGTC v. Norfolk Southern Railway to CGTC v. Norfolk Southern without leaving a redirect) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CGTR wip}} | |||
{{Infobox court case | {{Infobox court case | ||
|name = CGTC v. Norfolk Southern | |name = CGTC v. Norfolk Southern | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
|appealed from = | |appealed from = | ||
|appealed to = | |appealed to = | ||
|Outcome = | |Outcome = | ||
|related actions = | |related actions = | ||
|opinions = | |opinions = | ||
|keywords = <!-- {{hlist | }} --> | |keywords = <!-- {{hlist | }} --> | ||
|italic title = | |italic title = | ||
|Ruling = Norfolk Southern Corporation deemed liable for all damages and required to replace the wrecked SD32-ECO locomotive with an equal or greater quality locomotive | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{CGTR}} | |||
'''''CGTC v. Norfolk Southern''''' was a court case over the head-on collision of CGTC locomotive #5608 and an NS locomotive due to a PTC failure on the Norfolk Southern locomotive. CGTC would end up attempting to sue the Norfolk Southern Corporation as a result of this, and after approximately 204 days, the court would rule that the Norfolk Southern Corporation was liable for the incident, and that they would be required to replace the unsalvageable locomotive with an equal or greater quality locomotive. | '''''CGTC v. Norfolk Southern''''' was a court case over the head-on collision of CGTC locomotive #5608 and an NS locomotive due to a PTC failure on the Norfolk Southern locomotive. CGTC would end up attempting to sue the Norfolk Southern Corporation as a result of this, and after approximately 204 days, the court would rule that the Norfolk Southern Corporation was liable for the incident, and that they would be required to replace the unsalvageable locomotive with an equal or greater quality locomotive. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 5 May 2024
 | This article is incomplete, as it is a part of a work-in-progress series of articles covering the fictional railroad CGTR and related topics. This article is being worked on by user SwedishTurtles, and may be temporarily missing information. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
| CGTC v. Norfolk Southern | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Full case name | Central Gateway Turtle du Canada v. Norfolk Southern Corporation |
| Started | December 27, 2021 |
| Decided | July 19, 2022 |
| Ruling | |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation deemed liable for all damages and required to replace the wrecked SD32-ECO locomotive with an equal or greater quality locomotive | |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Mark R. Hornak Cathy Bissoon Christy C. Wiegand Marilyn Horan Nicholas Ranjan William S. Stickman IV |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Mark R. Hornak |
| Concurrence | Marilyn Horan Cathy Bissoon |
| Dissent | William S. Stickman IV Christy C. Wiegand |
| This article is part of a series on the |
| CGTR |
|---|
 |
CGTC v. Norfolk Southern was a court case over the head-on collision of CGTC locomotive #5608 and an NS locomotive due to a PTC failure on the Norfolk Southern locomotive. CGTC would end up attempting to sue the Norfolk Southern Corporation as a result of this, and after approximately 204 days, the court would rule that the Norfolk Southern Corporation was liable for the incident, and that they would be required to replace the unsalvageable locomotive with an equal or greater quality locomotive.