MNU v. Makko Oko: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Infobox court case | name = MNU v. Makko Oko | court = Supreme Court,<br>Opposh, NT, Makko Oko | image = Makko Oko Coat Of Arms.png | imagesize = | imagelink = | imagealt = | caption = | full name = | date decided = {{start date|2027|09|19|df=}} | citations = | ECLI = | transcripts = | judges = | number of judges = | decision by = | Majority = Gerlach, Reynolds | dissenting = Aponte, Sullivan | concur/dissent = | prior...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 35: Line 35:


== Decision ==
== Decision ==
The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying that it was unconstitutional, striking it down.
The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying it was unconstitutional.


==Opinions==
==Opinions==

Latest revision as of 05:52, 24 May 2024

MNU v. Makko Oko
Makko Oko Coat Of Arms.png
CourtSupreme Court,
Opposh, NT, Makko Oko
DecidedSeptember 19, 2027 (2027-09-19)
Case history
Appealed fromAppellate Court of Appeals of Makko Oko
Case opinions
MajorityGerlach, Reynolds
DissentAponte, Sullivan

MNU v. Makko Oko is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of Makko Oko on September 19th, 2027 on the constitutionality of the Act of Union 2027 and the conversion of divisions into full provinces with more autonomy.

Background

The case began after the ratification of the Act of Union 2027 and the NCRU refused to sue, supporting the law and what it would cause, so the MNU was formed as a pro-nationalist version of the NCRU and sued the government to get the law stricken down.

Decision

The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying it was unconstitutional.

Opinions

Effects

See Also