User:Slovunia

Slovunia ([slɒˈvʉːnɪə]), officially User:Slovunia ([ˈjʉːzə ˈkɒlən slɒˈvʉːnɪə]), is a user of iiwiki. He is a member of several modern-tech roleplay-focused regions, these being Esquarium, Æia and Kylaris, though it should be noted that the user mostly is involved in worldbuilding, not in roleplaying.

Nations created by this User

Currently, there are two nations created and roleplayed by this user, these being the Tudonian Kingdom (Template:Country data Tudonia) which can be found in a subregion of Asura known as Alemannia, and, the Brosian Republic (Template:Country data Brosia) in Euclea. While Tudonia is in Aeia and could be described as budget Switzerland on crack without banks or a lot of money, Brosia could be described as generic Eastern European trope of a pseudo-democratic, mildly run-down-looking nation with less tropes than usual and less badlinguistics than usual because it is done by an actual Slav.

To-do List

Oh boy, that’s gonna be a long list and I have no fucking clue where to start. I guess I’ll just list the pages I need to work on:

Name of Page	Current State	Further Notes
Sigairen	Bad(*)	incomplete introductory paragraph; incomplete infobox (missing: image skyline, image flag, image seal, image shield, nickname, image map (location within Tudonia, map of districts), area, timezone); mix of incomplete and blank sections; subsections under “transportation” partially outdated
Sigaerener Verkehrsbetriebe	Bad*	incomplete introductory paragraph; incomplete infobox (missing: logo, image (SVB Liniennetz), predecessors, founded, hq location, revenue, operating income, net income, assets, num employees); needs more sections (operations, fares, finances, corporate identity)
Alemannic Empire (not only mine)	Bad(*)	lots of retcon (needs to be incorporated into present lore better; replacement of Tyronova etc.); incomplete sections
Brosia	Bad*	incomplete intro; lacks sections besides “history”; incomplete infobox (missing: files)
Sigairen Municipal Forest	Bad	lacks sections besides “history”; incomplete infobox (missing: image)
Similian language	Good(*)	incomplete or (partially) outdated sections: dialects, phonology, orthography; lacks appropriate example (long)
Tudonia	Meh	incomplete sections: history; incomplete and blank subsections under: geography, politics and government, economy, demographics, culture; incomplete infobox (missing coa)
Similia	Bad	incomplete (everything)/stub
HGZ Alemannia (not only mine)	Bad*	incomplete sections (my projects: the section “route” (incl. “HGZ Nord”, “HGZ Süd” and “Connecting Lines”), adding Tudonia-relevant information to sections (especially “Notable Stations”, “Infrastructure”, “Costs”)
Alemannia	Bad*	blank sections; missing file: coa Tudonia

Please keep in mind that I still lack an objective measuring process to measure the current state of the articles and their quality (excellent/very good/good/meh/bad/very bad/unacceptable). The articles have spontaneously been reviewed by me and I just categorized them after briefly looking over them into quality-categories. The ones with an asterisk have been created so recently that any bad quality is excusable with their age, with the ones with an asterisk in parentheses having underwent significant retcon or change of usage recently.

For an article to be categorized as “excellent”, I will ask someone other than me to look over it. Otherwise, the article would be categorized as “very good”. For this, it needs to be up-to-date and mostly complete, basically. For an article to be categorized as “very bad”, its content must be harmful, misinformtive, and/or I must think it includes plagiarism. For “unacceptable”, this needs to be confirmed by someone else.