Crown v. Rochelle (Makko Oko): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox court case | {{Infobox court case | ||
|name = | |name = Crown v. Rochelle | ||
|court = [[Supreme Court of Makko Oko|Supreme Court]],<br>[[Opposh]], [[Makko Oko]] | |court = [[Supreme Court of Makko Oko|Supreme Court]],<br>[[Opposh]], [[Makko Oko]] | ||
|image = | |image = Makko Oko Coat Of Arms.png | ||
|imagesize = | |imagesize = | ||
|imagelink = | |imagelink = | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}} | }} | ||
''''' | '''''Crown v. Rochelle''''' is a case that was decided by the [[Supreme Court of Makko Oko]] on May 22nd, 2024 on a provision of the [[Kellison Terrorism Act of 2024 (Makko Oko)|Kellison Terrorism Act of 2024]] prohibiting free legal aid to those indicted on terrorism charges. | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Crown v. Rochelle began after Rochelle Vangelis, the defendant, attempted to overthrow the government and murdered a top ministerial official. In that, the Kellison Terrorism Act was ratified in response to the attacks in an attempt to curb future attacks and grant more authority to government bodies in doing so. After its enactment, Rochelle was charged with "encouragement of terroristic acts" and terrorism, with the state invoking Article 24 to revoke access to their state-funded attorney. Rochelle self-appealed the order that was approved by the overseeing judge all the way up to the Supreme Court. | |||
==Effects== | ==Effects== | ||
Latest revision as of 01:50, 12 August 2024
| Crown v. Rochelle | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court, Opposh, Makko Oko |
| Decided | May 22, 2024 |
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | Appellate Court of Appeals of Makko Oko |
| Subsequent action(s) | Court judgement approving termination of free legal aid for Rochelle Vangelis overturned, case remanded and Rochelle convicted of all charges, executed on February 20th, 2025. |
| Case opinions | |
| Article 19 guarantees state legal assistance for any citizens who are "not [able to pay for their own]". The article does not state an exclusion for terrorists or those who commit treason. For the request to revoke citizenship, denied due to Article 12 stating a committance of a high crime, not an indictment of one. Request denied, court order for prohibiting legal aid overturned, case remanded. | |
| Majority | Gerlach, Reynolds, Graham, Sparks, Sullivan |
| Dissent | Aponte |
Crown v. Rochelle is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of Makko Oko on May 22nd, 2024 on a provision of the Kellison Terrorism Act of 2024 prohibiting free legal aid to those indicted on terrorism charges.
Background
Crown v. Rochelle began after Rochelle Vangelis, the defendant, attempted to overthrow the government and murdered a top ministerial official. In that, the Kellison Terrorism Act was ratified in response to the attacks in an attempt to curb future attacks and grant more authority to government bodies in doing so. After its enactment, Rochelle was charged with "encouragement of terroristic acts" and terrorism, with the state invoking Article 24 to revoke access to their state-funded attorney. Rochelle self-appealed the order that was approved by the overseeing judge all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Effects
This case affirmed that all citizens irrespective of the indictment are entitled to free legal aid as long as they are low-income. In addition, the case restricted a once-broad power to revoke constitutionally guaranteed and protected citizenship to convicted offenders.
