User:Vjaarland/Sandbox2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Valduvian Schism''', alternatively referred to as the '''Valduvian Correction''' or '''Valduvian Reaction''', was a [[Sotirianity|Sotirian]] religious and political movement in the [[Platavian Union]] and parts of the [[Rudolphine Confederation]] during the 16th century. Usually characterized as part of the broader [[Amendist Reaction]], the movement saw the spread of [[Kausianism|Kausian]] theology throughout modern-day Valduvia and culminated in the ongoing break in communion between the [[Church of Valduvia]] and the [[Solarian Catholic Church]]. The movement's categorization as [[Amendism|Amendist]] is controversial, with many Kausian Sotirians interpreting the events as a rejection of doctrines imposed on Catholicism by the medieval {{wp|Pope|Papacy}} rather than | The '''Valduvian Schism''', alternatively referred to as the '''Valduvian Correction''' or '''Valduvian Reaction''', was a [[Sotirianity|Sotirian]] religious and political movement in the [[Platavian Union]] and parts of the [[Rudolphine Confederation]] during the 16th century. Usually characterized as part of the broader [[Amendist Reaction]], the movement saw the spread of [[Kausianism|Kausian]] theology throughout modern-day Valduvia and culminated in the ongoing break in communion between the [[Church of Valduvia]] and the [[Solarian Catholic Church]]. The movement's categorization as [[Amendism|Amendist]] is controversial, with many Kausian Sotirians interpreting the events as a rejection of doctrines imposed on Catholicism by the medieval {{wp|Pope|Papacy}} rather than an entirely new development. | ||
The Valduvian Reaction began in 1515 when [[Arvīds Kauss]], the [[Archbishop of Matīspils]], delivered his [[Letter of Grave Concern]] to [[Pope TBA]]. In his letter, Kauss expressed consternation over the excommunication and killing of leading reformer [[Johanne Stearn]] that had occurred several months prior, and outlined several [[Points of Contention|teachings and practices]] of the Catholic Church that Kauss argued were recent inventions inconsistent with historical Sotirianity. Kauss's points included critiques of {{wp|Papal supremacy|papal supremacy}}, {{wp|Clerical celibacy|clerical celibacy}}, {{wp|Indulgence|indulgences}}, the concept of {{wp|Purgatory|purgatory}}, {{wp|Closed communion|closed communion}}, {{wp|Filioque|filioque}}, the relationship and relative authority of {{wp|Bible|scripture}} and {{wp|Sacred tradition|sacred tradition}}, and Catholicism's claim to be the {{wp|One true church|one true church}}. Kauss gained a significant following among the Platavian clergy and was openly supported by King [[Matīss IX]], who promoted the spread of Kausian theology in neighboring [[Burland]] with the aim of undermining Rudolphine authority in the region. The Solarian Catholic Church ultimately repudiated Kauss's views at the [[Council of X]] in 15XX, and Kauss and his followers were excommunicated. The prelates of the Platavian and Burish churches subsequently established the [[Church of Valduvia]] in 15XX, marking the end of the Reaction. | The Valduvian Reaction began in 1515 when [[Arvīds Kauss]], the [[Archbishop of Matīspils]], delivered his [[Letter of Grave Concern]] to [[Pope TBA]]. In his letter, Kauss expressed consternation over the excommunication and killing of leading reformer [[Johanne Stearn]] that had occurred several months prior, and outlined several [[Points of Contention|teachings and practices]] of the Catholic Church that Kauss argued were recent inventions inconsistent with historical Sotirianity. Kauss's points included critiques of {{wp|Papal supremacy|papal supremacy}}, {{wp|Clerical celibacy|clerical celibacy}}, {{wp|Indulgence|indulgences}}, the concept of {{wp|Purgatory|purgatory}}, {{wp|Closed communion|closed communion}}, {{wp|Filioque|filioque}}, the relationship and relative authority of {{wp|Bible|scripture}} and {{wp|Sacred tradition|sacred tradition}}, and Catholicism's claim to be the {{wp|One true church|one true church}}. Kauss gained a significant following among the Platavian clergy and was openly supported by King [[Matīss IX]], who promoted the spread of Kausian theology in neighboring [[Burland]] with the aim of undermining Rudolphine authority in the region. The Solarian Catholic Church ultimately repudiated Kauss's views at the [[Council of X]] in 15XX, and Kauss and his followers were excommunicated. The prelates of the Platavian and Burish churches subsequently established the [[Church of Valduvia]] in 15XX, marking the end of the Reaction. | ||
The effects of the Reaction were widespread, with religious, societal, and political ramifications that permanently shaped the course of Valduvian history and that of [[Euclea]] as a whole. The movement resulted in Kausianism, specifically in its institutionalized form under the Church of Valduvia, emerging as the dominant Sotirian tradition in the territories of modern-day Valduvia. Kausian concepts such as ''scriptura per traditionem'' and {{wp|Branch theory|branch theory}} formed the basis for a new theological paradigm in {{wp|Western Christianity|Eastern Sotirianity}}, distinct from both Catholicism and most other strains of Amendism. The status of Kausian Sotirians in Burland was one of the primary causes of the [[Amendist Wars]] several decades later, with the Platavian Union ultimately intervening to protect the rights of Amendists to practice in the Rudolphine Confederation. Platavia and the Burish states subsequently formed the [[Valduvian Confederation]], the earliest predecessor of the modern Valduvian state, as a defensive bulwark against future aggression by the Rudolphines. The shared religious identity between Burlanders and ethnic Valduvians would later become central to the emergence of a Valduvian national identity in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. | The effects of the Reaction were widespread, with religious, societal, and political ramifications that permanently shaped the course of Valduvian history and that of [[Euclea]] as a whole. The movement resulted in Kausianism, specifically in its institutionalized form under the Church of Valduvia, emerging as the dominant Sotirian tradition in the territories of modern-day Valduvia. Kausian concepts such as ''scriptura per traditionem'' and {{wp|Branch theory|branch theory}} formed the basis for a new theological paradigm in {{wp|Western Christianity|Eastern Sotirianity}}, distinct from both Catholicism and most other strains of Amendism. The status of Kausian Sotirians in Burland was one of the primary causes of the [[Amendist Wars]] several decades later, with the Platavian Union ultimately intervening to protect the rights of Amendists to practice in the Rudolphine Confederation. Platavia and the Burish states subsequently formed the [[Valduvian Confederation]], the earliest predecessor of the modern Valduvian state, as a defensive bulwark against future aggression by the Rudolphines. The shared religious identity between Burlanders and ethnic Valduvians would later become central to the emergence of a Valduvian national identity in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. | ||
Revision as of 15:24, 19 January 2024
The Valduvian Schism, alternatively referred to as the Valduvian Correction or Valduvian Reaction, was a Sotirian religious and political movement in the Platavian Union and parts of the Rudolphine Confederation during the 16th century. Usually characterized as part of the broader Amendist Reaction, the movement saw the spread of Kausian theology throughout modern-day Valduvia and culminated in the ongoing break in communion between the Church of Valduvia and the Solarian Catholic Church. The movement's categorization as Amendist is controversial, with many Kausian Sotirians interpreting the events as a rejection of doctrines imposed on Catholicism by the medieval Papacy rather than an entirely new development.
The Valduvian Reaction began in 1515 when Arvīds Kauss, the Archbishop of Matīspils, delivered his Letter of Grave Concern to Pope TBA. In his letter, Kauss expressed consternation over the excommunication and killing of leading reformer Johanne Stearn that had occurred several months prior, and outlined several teachings and practices of the Catholic Church that Kauss argued were recent inventions inconsistent with historical Sotirianity. Kauss's points included critiques of papal supremacy, clerical celibacy, indulgences, the concept of purgatory, closed communion, filioque, the relationship and relative authority of scripture and sacred tradition, and Catholicism's claim to be the one true church. Kauss gained a significant following among the Platavian clergy and was openly supported by King Matīss IX, who promoted the spread of Kausian theology in neighboring Burland with the aim of undermining Rudolphine authority in the region. The Solarian Catholic Church ultimately repudiated Kauss's views at the Council of X in 15XX, and Kauss and his followers were excommunicated. The prelates of the Platavian and Burish churches subsequently established the Church of Valduvia in 15XX, marking the end of the Reaction.
The effects of the Reaction were widespread, with religious, societal, and political ramifications that permanently shaped the course of Valduvian history and that of Euclea as a whole. The movement resulted in Kausianism, specifically in its institutionalized form under the Church of Valduvia, emerging as the dominant Sotirian tradition in the territories of modern-day Valduvia. Kausian concepts such as scriptura per traditionem and branch theory formed the basis for a new theological paradigm in Eastern Sotirianity, distinct from both Catholicism and most other strains of Amendism. The status of Kausian Sotirians in Burland was one of the primary causes of the Amendist Wars several decades later, with the Platavian Union ultimately intervening to protect the rights of Amendists to practice in the Rudolphine Confederation. Platavia and the Burish states subsequently formed the Valduvian Confederation, the earliest predecessor of the modern Valduvian state, as a defensive bulwark against future aggression by the Rudolphines. The shared religious identity between Burlanders and ethnic Valduvians would later become central to the emergence of a Valduvian national identity in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.