MNU v. Makko Oko: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Infobox court case | name = MNU v. Makko Oko | court = Supreme Court,<br>Opposh, NT, Makko Oko | image = Makko Oko Coat Of Arms.png | imagesize = | imagelink = | imagealt = | caption = | full name = | date decided = {{start date|2027|09|19|df=}} | citations = | ECLI = | transcripts = | judges = | number of judges = | decision by = | Majority = Gerlach, Reynolds | dissenting = Aponte, Sullivan | concur/dissent = | prior...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
== Decision == | == Decision == | ||
The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying | The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying it was unconstitutional. | ||
==Opinions== | ==Opinions== | ||
Revision as of 05:52, 24 May 2024
| MNU v. Makko Oko | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court, Opposh, NT, Makko Oko |
| Decided | September 19, 2027 |
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | Appellate Court of Appeals of Makko Oko |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Gerlach, Reynolds |
| Dissent | Aponte, Sullivan |
MNU v. Makko Oko is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of Makko Oko on September 19th, 2027 on the constitutionality of the Act of Union 2027 and the conversion of divisions into full provinces with more autonomy.
Background
The case began after the ratification of the Act of Union 2027 and the NCRU refused to sue, supporting the law and what it would cause, so the MNU was formed as a pro-nationalist version of the NCRU and sued the government to get the law stricken down.
Decision
The court ruled 2-2-2 against ideological lines, keeping the original ruling by the Appellate Court of Appeals saying it was unconstitutional.
Opinions
Effects
See Also
