Sodality (Bahianology)

Members of the Imamfu society on the Ingona coast, modern day Mabifia. Circa 1908.

The term Sodality, when used in the context of academic discussion of Bahian societies and histories, refers to a tradition of initiatory societies, typically religious or otherwise spiritual, which have existed within Bahia across ethnic groups. Other terms which have been used have included Confraternity, which is now used to designate more specifically the secretive student clubs which have arisen in universities since Mabifia's independence, and secret society or hunter's lodge, which are still often used in popular history but have been abandoned due to the emotional meaning carried with the term. The term is used to designate any non-kinship based group which employs initiatory and secretive practices, has restricted membership, and a shared goal or mythos. Though often conflated with Bahian fetishism, sodalities are present in both Irfanic and Sotirian Bahia, and have been influential in the diaspora.

The institution of sodalities is believed to date back to artisan guilds during the Hourege period. As society was strictly divided into castes based on occupation, many of these professions such as hunters and blacksmiths formed initiatory groups to preserve their skills and share in rituals. However, the rise of sodalities to their peak of importance is typically held to have occured due to the pressures of the Transvehemens Slave Trade, which both threatened the Houregic system with the adoption of a more fiscalised state and presented dangers to both people's freedom and belief systems. Sodalities emerged to protect in-group members from slavery and to facilitate the trading of non-members through shared financial systems, while the secrecy and initiatory nature of such groups allowed fetishist and Irfanic belief systems to survive Euclean missionary influences. Sodalities were mistrusted during the colonial era and many were targetted by colonial authorities, though this approach was varied and in some areas sodalities were seen as a means of ruling otherwise restive peoples. In Euclean culture of the time, such societies were typically viewed as barbaric, with their secretive practices leading to rumous of cannibalism and violence which were played upon in Roman austral literature. Following independence, the approaches of Bahian governments vis a vis sodalities has typically been repressive, with their status as alternative sources of governance seen as subversive. Sodalities are also present in the Asterias, having played a key role in preserving Bahian identity among the diaspora.

Classification

In her work La Case noire: Les Sodalités en Baïe, bahianologist Michelle Yseult divided the different sodalities of Bahia into three categories based on their membership criteria. While these categories are somewhat general, they help to generalise trends of sodality structure, role, and activity. Not all of these categories are universal, with generational sodalities in particular being rarer.