National Principlism: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision imported) |
Britbong64 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|website = | |website = | ||
|country = }} | |country = }} | ||
'''National Principlism''' (''{{wp|Mandarin Chinese|Xiaodongese}}'': '''国家主体主义'''; ''Guójiā zhǔtǐ zhǔyì'') is a [[Xiaodong|Xiaodongese]] political ideology that has been prescribed as the state ideology of Xiaodong since | '''National Principlism''' (''{{wp|Mandarin Chinese|Xiaodongese}}'': '''国家主体主义'''; ''Guójiā zhǔtǐ zhǔyì'') is a [[Xiaodong|Xiaodongese]] political ideology that has been prescribed as the state ideology of Xiaodong since the declaration of the Auspicious Republic in 1940. Primarily formulated by [[Lu Keqian]] and drawing on {{wp|Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|legalism}} as its main ideological forebearer, National Principlism is a [[Xiaodongese nationalism|nationalist]] ideology that calls for an "enlightened" {{wp|Authoritarianism|authoritarian}} and modernised state that utilises a form of {{wp|neosocialism}}. In particular, National Principlism emphasises Xiaodong as an independent nation that must be based around a strong state based on the teachings of legalism, embrace {{wp|industrialisation}} and a {{wp|collectivism|collectivist}} culture, condemning {{wp|liberalism}}, {{wp|individualism}} and {{wp|private property}} in all forms. National Principlism also denounces both {{wp|Reformism|reformist}} and {{wp|Revolutionary socialism|revolutionary}} forms of socialism, instead calling for a third way that would see the state introduce a {{wp|technocracy|technocratic}} {{wp|planned economy}} through corrective means. | ||
National Principlism was officially followed by Xiaodongese governments between the [[Corrective Revolution (Xiaodong)|Corrective Revolution]] in 1934 to the 1980's following the death of [[Sun Yuting]]. Since then a more moderate form more friendly to the concepts of democracy and private property, [[Neo-National Principlism]] has been espoused by Xiaodongese leaders such as [[Yuan Xiannian]]. | National Principlism was officially followed by Xiaodongese governments between the [[Corrective Revolution (Xiaodong)|Corrective Revolution]] in 1934 to the 1980's following the death of [[Sun Yuting]]. Since then a more moderate form more friendly to the concepts of democracy and private property, [[Neo-National Principlism]] has been espoused by Xiaodongese leaders such as [[Yuan Xiannian]]. | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
National Principlism was formulated as a reaction to the failure of the Xiaodongese government to deal with Xiaodong’s social collapse, political disunity, economic implosion and national humiliation in the aftermath of the [[Senrian-Xiaodongese War]] and signing of the [[Treaty of Keishi]]. Many Xiaodongese intellectuals began to reject the foundations of the [[Heavenly Xiaodongese Empire]] which had been founded on | National Principlism was formulated as a reaction to the failure of the Xiaodongese government to deal with Xiaodong’s social collapse, political disunity, economic implosion and national humiliation in the aftermath of the [[Senrian-Xiaodongese War]] and signing of the [[Treaty of Keishi]]. Many Xiaodongese intellectuals began to reject the foundations of the [[Heavenly Xiaodongese Empire]] which had been founded on {{wp|Confucianism|Ruism}} and nationalist principles, and later embraced western ideals of scientific racism and constitutional government. Xiaodongese scholar Peng Chaozu looked to Xiaodongese history to create a new ideology that would strengthen the Xiaodongese state. Peng drew on legalist concepts that had been influential under the first Tao dynasty in the 1100 under which Xiaodong won a war against Senria. Peng saw this period of legalism as the golden age of Xiaodong and that Ruism, capitalism and western ideals had weakened Xiaodong and a return to strict order under a modernised legalist system - a rejuvenation of the nation - was required. | ||
These ideas were quickly adopted by general Lu Keqian who founded the [[Xiaodong Regeneration Society]] which prescribed these ideas as its ideology, calling them National Principlism. Under Lu and other ideologues the ideology became more radical, calling for a totalitarian, ultra-nationalist state with a socialist economy | These ideas were quickly adopted by general Lu Keqian who founded the [[Xiaodong Regeneration Society]] which prescribed these ideas as its ideology, calling them National Principlism. Under Lu and other ideologues the ideology became more radical, calling for a totalitarian, ultra-nationalist state with a socialist economy | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Peng also stated that this regeneration would be the "{{wp|Mandate from Heaven|final mandate from heaven}}". For centuries, Xiaodong had been guided under the belief that the heavens granted a king or emperor the right to rule but withdrew that right if the Sovereign was oppressive, incompetent, neglectful or failed to govern responsibly. Pen stated that following this rejuvenation of the Xiaodongese nation "''a perfect equilibrium, a perfect harmony, between the heavens, the sovereign'' (defined by Peng as the state) ''and the people will be reached...there would be no need for the mandate to be passed on after this rejuvenation''". | Peng also stated that this regeneration would be the "{{wp|Mandate from Heaven|final mandate from heaven}}". For centuries, Xiaodong had been guided under the belief that the heavens granted a king or emperor the right to rule but withdrew that right if the Sovereign was oppressive, incompetent, neglectful or failed to govern responsibly. Pen stated that following this rejuvenation of the Xiaodongese nation "''a perfect equilibrium, a perfect harmony, between the heavens, the sovereign'' (defined by Peng as the state) ''and the people will be reached...there would be no need for the mandate to be passed on after this rejuvenation''". | ||
===Legalism and totalitarianism=== | ===Legalism and totalitarianism=== | ||
National Principlism rejects the {{wp|Confucianism| | National Principlism rejects the {{wp|Confucianism|Ruist}} ideal that the state should exist to instil mortality and serve as an example to the people; rather, it draws heavily on a {{wp|Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|legalist}} views on humanity, seeing man as inherently inclined to perform immoral actions. As a result, the state rather than emphasise that if people followed the correct morality there would be little need for a strong state should actively seek to regulate and control the people's lives. Disobedience to the state should be met with harsh punishment and retribution to enforce social order. This legalist approach has been described as {{Wp|totalitarianism|totalitarian}}. | ||
===Nationalism=== | ===Nationalism=== | ||
===Socialism=== | ===Socialism=== | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Xiaodongese political scientist Jiang Jiqing criticised National Principlism on the grounds that it was "''ideologically bankrupt...National Principlism has little to offer outside bland platitudes that are stolen from other ideologies, both western and eastern. It is a out-dated, mis-placed, irrelevant to the real needs and contradictory''". | Xiaodongese political scientist Jiang Jiqing criticised National Principlism on the grounds that it was "''ideologically bankrupt...National Principlism has little to offer outside bland platitudes that are stolen from other ideologies, both western and eastern. It is a out-dated, mis-placed, irrelevant to the real needs and contradictory''". | ||
===Comparison with fascism=== | ===Comparison with fascism=== | ||
National Principlism has periodically been compared to | National Principlism has periodically been compared to functionalism due to its anti-capitalist, {{wp|palingenesis}}, authoritarian and nationalist standpoints. However, prominent National Principlists such as Qiao Denjiang have rejected this view, stating "''Xiaodongese National Principlism rejects all western "isms" and is solely based in Xiaodongese values''". Unlike functionalism, National Principlism calls for the destruction of the capitalist class the the reorganisation of society along the lines of the state and the people, with no intervening classes. | ||
==Neo-National Principlism== | ==Neo-National Principlism== | ||
{{main|Neo-National Principlism}} | {{main|Neo-National Principlism}} | ||
{{Xiaodong Regeneration Society}} | {{Xiaodong Regeneration Society}} | ||
[[Category:Xiaodong]][[Category:Politics in Xiaodong]] | [[Category:Xiaodong]][[Category:Politics in Xiaodong]] | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 18 December 2019
National Principlism | |
|---|---|
| Ideology | Xiaodongese nationalism Legalism Neosocialism Authoritarianism Revanchism Palingenesis |
| Political position | Centre-left (economic) Right-wing (social) |
National Principlism (Xiaodongese: 国家主体主义; Guójiā zhǔtǐ zhǔyì) is a Xiaodongese political ideology that has been prescribed as the state ideology of Xiaodong since the declaration of the Auspicious Republic in 1940. Primarily formulated by Lu Keqian and drawing on legalism as its main ideological forebearer, National Principlism is a nationalist ideology that calls for an "enlightened" authoritarian and modernised state that utilises a form of neosocialism. In particular, National Principlism emphasises Xiaodong as an independent nation that must be based around a strong state based on the teachings of legalism, embrace industrialisation and a collectivist culture, condemning liberalism, individualism and private property in all forms. National Principlism also denounces both reformist and revolutionary forms of socialism, instead calling for a third way that would see the state introduce a technocratic planned economy through corrective means.
National Principlism was officially followed by Xiaodongese governments between the Corrective Revolution in 1934 to the 1980's following the death of Sun Yuting. Since then a more moderate form more friendly to the concepts of democracy and private property, Neo-National Principlism has been espoused by Xiaodongese leaders such as Yuan Xiannian.
History
National Principlism was formulated as a reaction to the failure of the Xiaodongese government to deal with Xiaodong’s social collapse, political disunity, economic implosion and national humiliation in the aftermath of the Senrian-Xiaodongese War and signing of the Treaty of Keishi. Many Xiaodongese intellectuals began to reject the foundations of the Heavenly Xiaodongese Empire which had been founded on Ruism and nationalist principles, and later embraced western ideals of scientific racism and constitutional government. Xiaodongese scholar Peng Chaozu looked to Xiaodongese history to create a new ideology that would strengthen the Xiaodongese state. Peng drew on legalist concepts that had been influential under the first Tao dynasty in the 1100 under which Xiaodong won a war against Senria. Peng saw this period of legalism as the golden age of Xiaodong and that Ruism, capitalism and western ideals had weakened Xiaodong and a return to strict order under a modernised legalist system - a rejuvenation of the nation - was required.
These ideas were quickly adopted by general Lu Keqian who founded the Xiaodong Regeneration Society which prescribed these ideas as its ideology, calling them National Principlism. Under Lu and other ideologues the ideology became more radical, calling for a totalitarian, ultra-nationalist state with a socialist economy
Concepts
Rejuvenation
A key concept within National Principlism is that of zàishēng (再生), which translates to regenerate, or to rejuvenate. In a speech in 1935, Lu Keqian emphasised that Xiaodong needed to "rejuvenate" itself as a nation stating that the Xiaodongese people had under the semi-feudal Heavenly Xiaodongese Empire been subjected to traditionalism and reactionaryism that had to moral decay, decadence and exposure to foreign ideals that had disrupted the natural harmony of Xiaodong. Thus, Xiaodong needed to sweep away reactionary practice and halt the decline of the Xiaodongese nation by creating a new powerful state that would restore Xiaodong's social harmony.
According to National Principlist thought this regeneration must be progressive in nature, destroying outdated practice and reactionaryism and create a "new state" that would be industrial and modern in nature. National Principlist theorist Peng Chaozhu emphasised that "Xiaodong is behind the industrial nations in terms of socio-economic development...either we fall into ruin, are forced into adopting their barbaric practices or regenerate ourselves according to Xiaodongese customs."
Peng also stated that this regeneration would be the "final mandate from heaven". For centuries, Xiaodong had been guided under the belief that the heavens granted a king or emperor the right to rule but withdrew that right if the Sovereign was oppressive, incompetent, neglectful or failed to govern responsibly. Pen stated that following this rejuvenation of the Xiaodongese nation "a perfect equilibrium, a perfect harmony, between the heavens, the sovereign (defined by Peng as the state) and the people will be reached...there would be no need for the mandate to be passed on after this rejuvenation".
Legalism and totalitarianism
National Principlism rejects the Ruist ideal that the state should exist to instil mortality and serve as an example to the people; rather, it draws heavily on a legalist views on humanity, seeing man as inherently inclined to perform immoral actions. As a result, the state rather than emphasise that if people followed the correct morality there would be little need for a strong state should actively seek to regulate and control the people's lives. Disobedience to the state should be met with harsh punishment and retribution to enforce social order. This legalist approach has been described as totalitarian.
Nationalism
Socialism
National Principlism is anti-capitalist and supports the creation of a centralised command economy. National Principlist socialism however rejects the Welzist dialectic materialism and ethical socialism. National Principlism casts socialism as a liberating force from foreign colonialism, land lordism and feudalism and extols socialism on the grounds that is alone can create a modern, industrial state. According to National Principlist thought, socialism should be achieved through a "corrective revolution" rather than a "class revolution" which would create an authoritarian and technocratic state that would oversee a command economy, dismantling both parliamentary democracy and aristocratic feudalism. This form of socialism has been referred to as "neosocialism".
National Principlist Socialism does not aim for worker control of industry, not equality - rather it sees socialism as firstly being the most efficient means to modernise the state and as a means to promote the unity of the Xiaodongese people. Peng Chaozhu stated "Xiaodongese socialism describes the process of liberating the Xiaodongese people from decadence and corruption. It does not describe the dictatorship of the proletariat nor class collaboration - rather we call for the eradication of all classes and to re-establish society between the state and its subjects.".
Collectivism
National Principlism endorses the centralisation of state power believing that a centralised, authoritarian state is necessary for social order. Drawing on traditional Legalist beliefs Lu stated that the Xiaodongese people when exposed to liberal and individualist ideas they would become corrupt and anarchistic, and that only by the existence of a state with absolute power would societal harmony be achieved.
This form of collectivism under National Principlism saw a radical redefinition between society and the state. Lu rejected traditional social structures such as the family and instead stated that Xiaodongese citizens should submit themselves to the state alone. According to Lu, submission to any other figure than the sovereign would result in social chaos, and so the destruction of all forms of civil society as well as “private society” (i.e the family) was necessary to entrench the state’s power and result in order.
Criticism
Xiaodongese political scientist Jiang Jiqing criticised National Principlism on the grounds that it was "ideologically bankrupt...National Principlism has little to offer outside bland platitudes that are stolen from other ideologies, both western and eastern. It is a out-dated, mis-placed, irrelevant to the real needs and contradictory".
Comparison with fascism
National Principlism has periodically been compared to functionalism due to its anti-capitalist, palingenesis, authoritarian and nationalist standpoints. However, prominent National Principlists such as Qiao Denjiang have rejected this view, stating "Xiaodongese National Principlism rejects all western "isms" and is solely based in Xiaodongese values". Unlike functionalism, National Principlism calls for the destruction of the capitalist class the the reorganisation of society along the lines of the state and the people, with no intervening classes.