Open Fifties

The Open Fifties, alternatively known as or written as the Open '50s or Open 1950s, is a cultural colloquialism in Yisraeli popular culture that refers to the period from the end of the Year of Blood (1951) until the start of the Fourth West Scipian War (1963). This roughly 12-year period was a highly controversial era in Yisraeli life, characterized by a shift towards the left culturally and fiscally in politics and society, including a relaxing of religious practices and strictures.

Some scholars propose an extended timeline until 1976, as while the brief wartime Conservative presidency of Nosson Zadlec reversed some policy and political changes during the midst of the Fourth West Scipian War, many of these trends continued until the late 1970s, when Yisraeli society turned rightward in a reaction to the perceived disorder and breakdown in tradition resulting from the "Open '50s" as well as a backlash to the Yarden Accords. The era was considered culminated during the beginning of the presidency of Binyamin Schartz (1976-1984). In a op-ed by Chiloni social critic Joshua Hulien in June 1978, he laments that "[w]e are witnessing the end of our beloved generation [...] our open '50s and free '60s, now no more."

Origins

"Spirit of 1919"

There had been a seismic shift in popular perception and sentiment in the run-up to, and aftermath of, the 1919 Revolution. Liberal forces, operating behind-the-scenes among sectors of the elite and through popular agitation among the working sectors, had slowly introduced new ideas from Belisarian liberal states, including Arthurista and Brumen, among others. The brutality and excesses of hyper-nationalism during the 2nd West Scipian War in the mid-1910s against Sydalon along with the increasingly autocratic and publicly corrupt absolute monarchy of King Nechemia II had slowly (or in some cases, quickly) changed minds, and an increasing majority of Yisraelis from across social and economic sectors wanted change. The Constitutional Liberals led the uprising after the 2nd WSW's conclusion to force a constitution, and within months and backed by popular support, the liberal revolution succeeded and a constitutional monarchy and representative elected government were established.

Historians have coined this new post-1919 sentiment the "spirit of 1919," as despite the remnants of reactionary political forces and supporters of the old Yisrael, a new majority supported the revolution and its principles, and rejected any perceived backsliding towards absolute monarchy and widespread electoral disenfranchisement and lack of political participation. This was strongest in the 1920s, felt intensely as the successful constitutionalists beat back political posturing from the defeated absolutists to strengthen the 1919 revolution's aims, including firm limits on the monarchy's power, a crackdown on corruption among the government bureaucracy and religious (rabbinic) establishment, extending the voting franchise to most or all Yisraeli men, and breaking up powerful private monopolies that the absolutist Crown had supported previously.

By the late 1920s, there was some fatigue in the public as left-wing activists, especially labor supporters who introduced Warnerist ideologies among the industrial working sector, tried pushing new laws that went beyond the public's appetite. The Conservatives, themselves, had started to internalize the supremacy of the Constitution and understood there was no popular desire to return to a pre-1919 order. In the 1930s, the Conservatives had won bouts of political power by utilizing the parliamentary system, and were by and large careful to avoid attacks on the Constitution's legitimacy. The West Scipian Contention with Sydalon heated up in the 1930s, and nationalism arose again as tensions flared.

The spirit of 1919 was dealt its biggest blow after the complete Yisraeli defeat in Phase I of the 3rd West Scipian War in the fall 1941. The full Sydalene occupation of the Yarden River Valley, stiff sanctions and war reparations, and limits on the Yisraeli military's size and armament, as well as the looming threat of Sydalon's military occupying the whole country, introduced a public panic such that most Yisraelis feared that the country was coming to end and would be subjected to annexation or other harsh rule of the devoutly Fabrian Catholic Sydalenes. General David Azoulay's military coup and subsequent autocratic rule threatened to bury the 1919 popular spirit, and for several years it subsided to low whispers and the embrace of leftist resistance to Azoulay's rule, as will be discussed below.

However, the fall of the Supreme Autocrat and the insistence by the conservative-liberal-oriented Constitutionalist faction during the Year of Blood reignited public fervor for the ideals, which, combined with the post-conflict publication of the horror of mass executions and other brutality in areas of Yisrael under the Socialist Front's control during the civil war, reinforced the public's overwhelming support to restore the 1920 constitutional order under new, moderately liberal leadership.

Labor activism

Already by the early-to-mid 19th century, Warnerist and syndicalist-inspired labor activism had reached Yisrael, the former largely from Belisaria and the latter from Talahara. These networks of labor agitation, underground mass meetings, general strikes, assassinations of captains of industry and other illegal actions, were routinely suppressed by the absolute monarchy's Royal Yisrael Secret Service and national police. The great White Terror at the end of that century cemented the labor movement's criminalization.

The youthful and modernizing King Meir II, while implementing the White Terror laws early in his reign, became increasingly sympathetic to arguments for reform by advocates of the middle and poor sectors, which showed the increasing poverty and often harsh conditions in industrial factories. He executed several royal decrees reaffirming halachic requirements by Jewish industrialists and employers over working conditions and treatment of their workers, as well as involved the Crown to oversee and investigate allegations of mispayment and other financial abuses by some industrialists and manufacturers. These reforms eased support for more systemic changes, and between Meir's benevolent approach and the White Terror legal regime, the labor movement remained small, hunted by the state authorities, and largely unable to change many minds towards Warnerist or syndicalist thought as intended.

This changed quickly upon his death in 1909, upon which is son Nechemia II assumed the throne. Considered vain, ambitious, susceptible to flattery and easily angered by criticism, Nechemia removed many of his father's reformist advisors and officials and replaced them with a cohort of reactionary and hardliner supporters. In the 1910s, Nechemia II's harsh response to even polite criticism, large-scale ignorance to the plight of factory workers and other working men and women, as well as growing perception that his wealthy and elite supporters were growing richer and more powerful as the workers fell behind, sparked a growing and reinvigorated labor movement. Eagerly backed by Talaharan syndicalist leaders and many Warnerist intellectuals in Arthurista and elsewhere, money, foreign labor activists, and new optimism flooded the Yisraeli working sector.

Helping their cause was the ravages of the 2nd West Scipian War, where thousands of young Yisraeli men lost their lives or were grievous wounded in the static, trench warfare. Traumatized by the war, feeling ignored by their monarch and government, and seeing the struggles of their family upon returning from the front, many young Yisraelis became convinced that the economy needed to be changed and workers empowered, by removing or limiting management and their perceived increasing wealth.

When the 1919 Revolution erupted, the industrial areas and working sector were among the most fervent supporters of the liberal revolutionaries, and fought ferociously against the Nechemia II regime's forces. However, the revolution mainly changed politics, not the economy. A few labor laws were passed in the early 1920s, by labor activists who had the ear of the new liberal elite. But, by and large, systemic change to working conditions and the treatment of workers was not forthcoming, and labor activists formed their own political parties in the late 1920s. Several general strikes broke out by railroad or industrial workers in the late 1920s and early 1930s, all put down by employer-armed strike breakers or state authorities.

Increasing labor strikes or inspired riots in working-income areas became a political foil for the Conservatives in parliamentary elections during the 1930s, and the Constitutional Liberals likewise labelled them "threats to public order and peace" and demonstrated little sympathy. In the 1930s, more hard-line labor activists fully embraced Warnerist or syndicalist thought, and many became anarchists or left-wing revolutionaries, believing that reforms in the existing system were all but impossible and that a worker's revolution along the lines of the Talaharan anarchist revolution in 1838 would be needed. These labor movements were harshly suppressed in the 1940s under the Autocracy but re-emerged with a vengeance after the January 1950 uprising, which kicked off the Year of Blood.

While many, if not most, of the largest and most committed labor factions were aligned with the Socialist Front of Yisrael's brutal campaign for a left-wing revolution, there were more moderate factions of laborists who aligned with the Constitutionalists during the civil war. At the end of the Year of Blood, Azoulayist ideology as well as Warnerist and related syndicalist thought had both been broadly discredited by each faction's violent acts of barbarity during and preceding the civil war, but the faction of railway workers and firearm workers led by laborist Shmuel Akelli emerged victorious, being a top ally and friend to Asher Berkowitz, who led the provisional government and then the restored kingdom's top elected role.

Second reaction: Yarden peace process and late-60s liberalism

Main articles: Yarden Accords, Yarden revisionist movements, Binyamin Schwartz, and Late Sixties crisis

See also

• Chiloni-dati divide
• White Terror (19th century)