IIWiki:Today's featured article: Difference between revisions
(June 2023 Update) |
(July 2023 Update) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File: | <div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File:NationalFunctionalistAxe.png|150px]]</div> '''National Functionalism''' is a {{wp|Far-right politics|far-right}}, {{wp|authoritarian}}, {{wp|Cultural nationalism|cultural nationalist}} political ideology characertised by beliefs in a strong centralised state, a rejection of {{wp|individualism}}, a belief in superiority based on culture and cultural origins, and the concept of the state as a {{wp|Organicism|living organism}} of which individuals are constituent parts, commonly referred to as the ''communauté populaire''. The term [[National Functionalism#Contemporary Functionalism|neo-Functionalist]] emerged following the [[Great War (Kylaris)|Great War]] to describe groups emulating the Functionalist ideology. National Functionalism arose in [[Gaullica]]n militaristic political circles in the late 19th century, following the [[War of the Triple Alliance]]. Gaullican defeat in the war, the loss of traditional territories such as [[Kesselbourg]] and [[Hennehouwe]] and the fragmentation of traditional allies in [[Soravia]] and [[Valduvia]] left the nation diplomatically isolated and fueled {{wp|revanchist}} sentiment. The tenets of the ideology can be traced to Gaëtan de Trintignant, a Gaullican Field Marshal who wrote numerous political treatises demanding a rejection of the modernity typified by the constitutional amendments that had whittled the power of the Gaullican monarchy following the Age of Revolutions. In two political works, de Trintignant outlined his beliefs on the necessity of a strong central authority, a rejection of both ''{{wp|laissez-faire}}'' {{wp|capitalism}} and international {{wp|socialism}}, a strong sense of social cohesion underpinned by a civic national identity and the establishment of the means to spread this identity. Inspired by the growing field of {{wp|sociology}}, de Trintignant viewed the state as a parallel to the human body, with a healthly state achieved when each part was working in concert. There is some debate regarding whether National Functionalism is an ideology specific to Gaullican political development, or if it has had wider influence. In the modern day, National Functionalism has experienced a sharp decline. The ideology was officially outlawed in Gaullica as a threat to constitutional order following the Great War and its proponents were targeted by DENAT as part of the {{wp|Denazification|defunctionalisation}} of the country. Modern neo-Functionalists are a fringe movement in [[Euclea]]n politics. Nevertheless, in the context of nationalist groups like the Etrurian [[Tribune Movement]] and Paretian [[O Povo]], Functionalist has re-entered political discourse as a pejorative term for members of those parties. ('''[[National Functionalism|See more...]]''') | ||
<div align="right"> | <div align="right"> | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 8 July 2023
National Functionalism is a far-right, authoritarian, cultural nationalist political ideology characertised by beliefs in a strong centralised state, a rejection of individualism, a belief in superiority based on culture and cultural origins, and the concept of the state as a living organism of which individuals are constituent parts, commonly referred to as the communauté populaire. The term neo-Functionalist emerged following the Great War to describe groups emulating the Functionalist ideology. National Functionalism arose in Gaullican militaristic political circles in the late 19th century, following the War of the Triple Alliance. Gaullican defeat in the war, the loss of traditional territories such as Kesselbourg and Hennehouwe and the fragmentation of traditional allies in Soravia and Valduvia left the nation diplomatically isolated and fueled revanchist sentiment. The tenets of the ideology can be traced to Gaëtan de Trintignant, a Gaullican Field Marshal who wrote numerous political treatises demanding a rejection of the modernity typified by the constitutional amendments that had whittled the power of the Gaullican monarchy following the Age of Revolutions. In two political works, de Trintignant outlined his beliefs on the necessity of a strong central authority, a rejection of both laissez-faire capitalism and international socialism, a strong sense of social cohesion underpinned by a civic national identity and the establishment of the means to spread this identity. Inspired by the growing field of sociology, de Trintignant viewed the state as a parallel to the human body, with a healthly state achieved when each part was working in concert. There is some debate regarding whether National Functionalism is an ideology specific to Gaullican political development, or if it has had wider influence. In the modern day, National Functionalism has experienced a sharp decline. The ideology was officially outlawed in Gaullica as a threat to constitutional order following the Great War and its proponents were targeted by DENAT as part of the defunctionalisation of the country. Modern neo-Functionalists are a fringe movement in Euclean politics. Nevertheless, in the context of nationalist groups like the Etrurian Tribune Movement and Paretian O Povo, Functionalist has re-entered political discourse as a pejorative term for members of those parties. (See more...)
KEEP THIS ONE PARAGRAPH IN LENGTH so it doesn't push the main page section down below the other section.