This article belongs to the lore of Astyria.

Droughers' Party

Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Company of Droughers
AbbreviationDP
Warden of the DroughersRichard de Sceller, Lord of Stavensound
HeadquartersSurcourt House, Lendert-with-Cadell
Youth wingNew Youth Movement
IdeologyDemocratic nationalism
Low Church
Political positionRight
Colour  Yellow
Houses of Commons
131 / 315

The Company of Droughers (pronounced drafters), commonly known as The Droughers’ Party, is one of the two major political blocs in Erbonian politics. Its main opposition is the Coalition of the Company of Scodeliers and the Conservative Party of Erbonia, which currently are the governing party of Great Nortend.

History

The Droughers originated as a political faction during the „Olnish Matter” who wished to prevent the marriage and „draw apart” the union of Queen Mary to Charles de Oln, the Count of Scode. The opposition was aroused owing to Scode’s being an Akeepian high churchman, against the dominant Lutheran Frympellite churchmanship. It was feared that the marriage would betoken a shift in religious preferment in the Church of Nortend towards the „Catholick” religion of the Akeepians. Subsequent to the marriage, and the dominance of the Akeepian high church, the Droughers advocated for more „Protestant” or reformed religion, and opposed the Akeepian orthodoxy of the established church. This expanded through the 19th century into a more classically liberal, albeit not individualistic, philosophy of freedoms and democracy against absolute monarchy, which the Scodeliers supported.

Ideology

In 1954 the Chesvoir opposition adopted „Democratic Nationalism” as their new ideology, influenced by the unassailable popularity of nationalist conservatism after the Droughers’ massive defeat in 1952. The Droughers’ idea of „Democratic Nationalism” consider it encompass a broad and flexible idea, where the goal is not to reach a specific ideal as in the Coalition ideology of conservative nationalism, but rather acceptance that change consistent with the nation’s desire is not unwarranted. Thus, it continues to emphasise mild liberal freedoms and the democratic will of the people as a way of identifying what the goal of „nationalism” is.