Gylian federal election, 1969

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Gylian federal election, 1969
GyliasFlag (1959).png
← 1962 22 January 1969 1976 →

All 285 seats in the Chamber of Deputies
All 400 seats in the Senate
143 Chamber of Deputies seats and 201 Senate seats needed for a majority
Turnout94,7%
  First party Second party Third party
  DarnanCyras.jpg SasaRuişela(small).jpg
LU
Leader Darnan Cyras Sasa Ruişela Hasy Talir
Party DCP MCP NLP
Alliance PA CG LU
Leader since 1946 1961 1960
Leader's seat Tomes Nerveiík-Iárus-Daláyk Elena
Last election
Seats won
Seat change
  • Decrease 1
  • Steady
  • Increase 4
  • Decrease 4
  • Decrease 7
  • Decrease 5
FP vote
  • 1.860.697 C
  • 1.733.992 S
  • 1.061.806 C
  • 977.745 S
  • 1.403.853 C
  • 1.341.682 S
Percentage
  • 32,7% C
  • 30,4% S
  • 18,6% C
  • 17,2% S
  • 24,6% C
  • 23,5% S
Swing
  • Decrease 3,2% C
  • Decrease 6,1% S
  • Decrease 0,7% C
  • Decrease 2,6% S
  • Decrease 5,4% C
  • Decrease 6,3% S

Gylias-elections-federal-1969-map.png
Plurality of deputies by region*
  PA   LU   CG   NI
* (SL, MK, GC, and GE counted as one circonscription)

Prime Minister before election

Darnan Cyras
PA

Prime Minister after election

Darnan Cyras
PA

Federal elections were held in Gylias on 22 January 1969, to elect the 285 members of the Chamber of Deputies and 400 members of the Senate.

The incumbent Darnan Cyras government was re-elected with minor losses at the height of the Golden Revolution. The main highlight of the election was the appearance of the LSD Party, whose tongue-in-cheek campaign and platform made it the largest non-inscrit party.

Electoral system

Both chambers of the Gylian Parliament were elected through single transferable vote, using the Droop quota.

The Chamber of Deputies was elected using 5-member circonscriptions, drawn by Elections Gylias based on regional populations.

The Senate was elected by regions, each electing 20 senators.

Parties were not allowed to nominate more than one candidate per seat.

Parties

Electoral bloc Parties Political position
Progressive Alliance
(PA)
DCP, SP, SDP, DL, LSL Left-wing to far-left
Liberal Union
(LU)
NUP, NLP, PRRA, LLR, FSP Centre-left
Centre Group
(CG)
MCP, RDC, RCP, IPR, CCM Centre to centre-right
Revolutionary Rally
(RR)
RWP, WLF, PRV, RCR, RMP Far-left
Conservative Coalition
(CC)
CP, RP, UPF, NSM, LUR Right-wing to far-right
Front for Renewal of Order and Society
(FROS)
ACFF, PNM, RNM, PND, RU Far-right
Non-inscrits
(NI)
ARENA, FLP, IRAM, LSDP, MED, NPP, PFT, RJU, UI, UM, UNR Various

Background

In the 7 years since the previous federal election, the Golden Revolution was in full flower. The booming economy and social revolution created a climate of widespread prosperity and revolutionary exuberance. Notable reflectious included a flourishing pop culture scene that found success abroad, and transformation of gender and sexual norms.

Although the Darnan Cyras government benefited from the consolidation of the Gylian consensus and its role in the Golden Revolution, it was still challenged. The big electoral blocs increasingly lost ground to the Non-inscrits, a trend first visible in local elections. The government's withering away of the state turn, a lingering controversy since the end of the Liberation War, erupted in "anarchaos" protests in 1968.

Inspired by contemporary protests in Akashi, the "anarchaos" protests were unsuccessful. Their egoist tendency, unclear grievances, and attempts to instigate fights with the widely-respected Gylian Police made them unpopular.[1] The "anarchaotics" founded the LSD Party as a political vehicle, but were quickly expelled due to a factional battle, and the party instead adopted acid communism as its main ideology.

The protests also benefited the National Reconstruction Alliance, which leveraged its image-based politics and lack of clear ideology to win support from voters who were exasperated with "anarchaotics".

Another significant political force to emerge was the Movement for Emancipation and Democracy, which seized left-wing populist ground with its economic nationalism and the charismatic leadership of Maria Elena Durante. Before the election, it formed a political alliance with the New People's Party. The two parties fielded joint candidates and ran a united campaign.

Campaign

The petite république poster created by the Progressive Alliance

With the Golden Revolution ongoing, the established electoral blocs' campaigns were compared by some commentators to a "comedown" from the heights of 1962. Their collective manifestos were more modest in aims, and their campaigning took a more comfortably subdued tone.

The Progressive Alliance, as the incumbents, went into the election with comfortable advantages: high popularity, the successes of the Golden Revolution, respected cabinet ministers, and indirect support from the Revolutionary Communications Office. Their main challenge, according to Jessica Freeman, was "revolutionary complacency": the risk of losing touch with the popular agitation that drove the social revolution.

Their collective manifesto was parodied: compared to the utopian goals of 1962, it largely promised a continuation of the Golden Revolution. Its sole major promise was to establish regional governments. Nevertheless, its advantages seemed enough to see it through.

The Liberal Union took their usual role as pragmatic foils for the more utopian PA. This campaign saw them play down economic policy[2] and focus on themes of political reform, individual liberties, and a philosophy of rights. They supported the establishment of regional governments. Their proposals to reduce the threshold for constituting municipal government were less popular, and rejected in a 1968 referendum.

The Centre Group were a known quantity as the official opposition. Sasa Ruişela earned comparisons to Beatrice Albini, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate at the ballot box.[3]

The Revolutionary Rally, Conservative Coalition, and Front for Renewal of Order and Society remained marginalised, and practically nonentities during the campaign. The RR's anti-"anarchaos" stance worsened its image as "old left dinosaurs", obsessed with economics and reactionary on social issues. The compositions of the CC and FROS changed slightly due to certain parties being shut down for anti-constitutional activities.

The Non-inscrits proved the stars of the campaign, and the new LSD Party its main attraction. Boasting an acid communist stance and a charismatic foresitter in Hildegard Wirner, the party used satire to make its point, and humorously embraced drugs as a force of revolutionary liberation. It ran on the slogan Gylias needs LSD, and its platform included pledges to create state-owned "oxygen clinics", adding LSD to the national water supply (parodying conspiracies around water fluoridation), and establishing Special Tourist Districts for sex tourism.

Maria Elena Durante campaigned heavily for the MED–NPP alliance, and her left-wing populist platform and demagogue rhetoric found an appeal among voters who were skeptical of the Golden Revolution's ambitions, but were not social conservatives or reactionaries. Similarly, the National Reconstruction Alliance attracted voters exasperated by the "anarchaotics" but opposed to right-wing parties. Emilia Malandrino even used the PPBs to promote ARENA as a harmless protest vote.

Results

In accordance with electoral law, the results were embargoed until the full counting and transfers were completed, and were released all at once on 25 January.

Gylias-elections-federal-1969-D.svg
Gylias-elections-federal-1969-S.svg
Parties and blocs Chamber of Deputies Senate
FPV % ± Seats ± FPV % ± Seats ±
Progressive Alliance 1.860.697 32,7% Decrease 3,2% 89 Decrease 1 1.733.992 30,4% Decrease 6,1% 90 Steady
Liberal Union 1.403.853 24,6% Decrease 5,4% 57 Decrease 7 1.341.682 23,5% Decrease 6,3% 84 Decrease 5
Non-inscrits and independents 1.218.621 21,4% Increase 11,4% 76 Increase 10 1.504.893 26,4% Increase 16,0% 158 Increase 9
Centre Group 1.061.806 18,6% Decrease 0,7% 59 Increase 4 977.745 17,2% Decrease 2,6% 68 Decrease 4
Revolutionary Rally 85.410 1,5% Decrease 0,5% 2 Decrease 3 84.814 1,5% Decrease 0,5% 0 Steady
Conservative Coalition 54.470 1,0% Decrease 0,5% 1 Decrease 3 48.981 0,9% Decrease 0,3% 0 Steady
Front for Renewal of Order and Society 10.375 0,2% Steady 1 Steady 7.149 0,1% Decrease 0,1% 0 Steady
Total 5.695.232 100% 285 5.699.256 100% 400
Registered voters and turnout 6.071.040 94,7%

Analysis

Little changed from 1962. No bloc won a majority by itself. The PA maintained their plurality in both chambers, and the LU remained close behind in first preference votes. Although the CG finished third in first preference votes, they managed to win 2 more deputies than the LU, making them the second-largest bloc in the Chamber of Deputies.

Despite first preference vote losses of 3%–5% for the Chamber of Deputies and 6% for the Senate, the PA–LU alliance managed to hold on to most of its seats. The PA only lost one deputy, while the LU lost 7 deputies and 5 senators.

The non-inscrits performed best. The LSDP played a key role, becoming the largest non-inscrit party. The non-inscrits increased their first preference vote by over 10% in both chambers. However, due to the multiple parties and electoral system, their gains were more modest: 10 new deputies and 9 new senators. Other notable beneficiaries were ARENA and the MED–NPP alliance, both of which won the maximum 20 Senate seats possible for a party.

The RR and CC experienced further losses, while the FROS remained stagnant.

At the regional level, the PA once again swept mainland Gylias, the LU held their strongholds of Arxaþ, Alţira, and Elena, and the CG held its stronghold of Nerveiík-Iárus-Daláyk. The non-inscrits built on their previous performance, winning a plurality of deputies in Nauras, Kausania, and Tandar, and coming a close second in Mişeyáke, Nezyál, and Herlan.

Many anarchist-leaning voters dissatisfied with the PA's performance in government switched to the LSDP.

Aftermath

The new Parliament was sworn in on 1 February 1969. The Darnan Cyras government was returned with minor losses: it held onto a majority in the Chamber of Deputies and was now 7 seats short a majority in the Senate.

The CC was destroyed by the election. Reduced to only one deputy, it underwent entryism by "constructives" and its member parties were all abolished, replaced by the progressive conservative National Bloc. This ushered a period of political realignment. Many centre-right politicians previously elected under other banners joined the NB parties instead, leaving the CG as a centrist formation. The NB performed very well in the first regional elections of 1970, municipal elections of 1970, and the presidential election of 1975, raising expectations they would become a serious contender in the next federal election.

The MED's campaign approach and results are seen by historians as a forerunner of the RR's rise during the wretched decade; indeed when the MED disbanded due to Maria Elena's death in 1975, much of its former support transferred to the RR.

Notes

  1. The government organised a "state abolition" referendum in September 1968 and encouraged voters to vote invalidly. Voters did so, invalidating the referendum, and defusing the protests.
  2. They found their economic policy did little to excite the electorate.
  3. By this point, the ongoing "constructive"–"recalcitrant" war and resulting concentration of centre-right politicians in the CG frustrated Gylian centrists. One remarked: "We have a left bloc, a centre-left bloc, a centre-right bloc, and a right bloc, but no centre."