Centre Group (Gylias): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Infobox political party | name = Centre Group | colorcode = {{G-CG/meta/color}} | logo = | foundation = 1960 | ideology = {{plainlist| *...")
 
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox political party
{{Infobox political party
| name          = Centre Group
| name          = Centre Group
| colorcode      = {{G-CG/meta/color}}
| colorcode      = #FFA500
| logo          =  
| logo          =  
| foundation    = 1960
| foundation    = 1960
Line 9: Line 9:
* {{wpl|Progressivism}}
* {{wpl|Progressivism}}
* {{wpl|Reformism}} }}
* {{wpl|Reformism}} }}
| position      = '''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Centrism|Centre}} to {{wpl|Centre-right politics|Centre-right}}<br>'''Cotemporary''':<br>{{wpl|Centrism|Centre}}
| position      = {{wpl|Centrism|Centre}}<br>'''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Centrism|Centre}} to {{wpl|Centre-right politics|Centre-right}}
| colors        = {{Color box|{{G-CG/meta/color}}|border=darkgray}} Orange
| colors        = {{Color box|#FFA500|border=darkgray}} Orange
| country        = Gylias
| country        = Gylias
}}
}}
Line 17: Line 17:


==History==
==History==
The bloc was formed by the {{G-MCP/meta/shortname}} and {{G-RDC/meta/shortname}} after [[Law on Electoral Representation of 1960|electoral reform]] in 1960. Motivated by their narrow entrance into the [[Gylian Parliament|Popular Assembly]] in [[Gylian federal election, 1958|1958]], it was the first {{wpl|electoral bloc}} established in Gylias. Three further parties formed in the bloc — the {{G-RCP/meta/shortname}}, {{G-IPR/meta/shortname}}, and {{G-CCM/meta/shortname}} — as part of a general consolidation of 5-party electoral blocs.
The bloc was formed by the Moderate Centrist Party and Rally of the Democratic Centre after [[Law on Electoral Representation of 1960|electoral reform]] in 1960. Motivated by their narrow entrance into the [[Gylian Parliament|Popular Assembly]] in [[Gylian federal election, 1958|1958]], it was the first {{wpl|electoral bloc}} established in Gylias.


Due to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Free Territories|"constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle]] within [[Conservatism in Gylias|Gylian conservatism]], many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean {{wpl|Centre-right politics|centre-right}} in its early years. It performed respectably in the [[Gylian federal election, 1962|1962]] and [[Gylian federal election, 1969|1969]] federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader [[Sasa Ruişela]] proved a [[Beatrice Albini]]-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics.
Due to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Free Territories|"constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle]] within [[Conservatism in Gylias|Gylian conservatism]], many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean {{wpl|Centre-right politics|centre-right}} in its early years. It performed respectably in the [[Gylian federal election, 1962|1962]] and [[Gylian federal election, 1969|1969]] federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader [[Sasa Ruişela]] proved a [[Beatrice Albini]]-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics.
Line 25: Line 25:
Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the [[wretched decade]], as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the [[Aén Ďanez government]].
Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the [[wretched decade]], as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the [[Aén Ďanez government]].


Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government.
Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the [[Ossorian war crisis]] of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government.


During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14%. While remaining centrist, this period also consolidated its closeness towards the NB.
The [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]] proved to be a breakthrough for {{G-NI}}, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. The CG's long record in opposition proved beneficial, and it largely retained its existing support.


Following the [[Gylian federal election, 2020|2020]], the CG joined the [[Lena Haidynraix government]].
During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14%.


==Composition==
==Composition==
Line 37: Line 37:
!Main ideology
!Main ideology
|-
|-
| style="background:{{G-MCP/meta/color}}"|
| style="background:#FFBF00"|
|{{G-MCP}} (MCP)
|Moderate Centrist Party (MCP)
|{{flatlist|
|{{flatlist|
* {{wpl|Centrism}}
* {{wpl|Centrism}}
* [[Liberalism in Gylias|social liberalism]] }}
* [[Liberalism in Gylias|social liberalism]] }}
|-
|-
| style="background:{{G-RDC/meta/color}}"|
| style="background:#EAA221"|
|{{G-RDC}} (RDC)
|Rally of the Democratic Centre (RDC)
|{{flatlist|
|{{flatlist|
* {{wpl|Radical centrism}}
* {{wpl|Radical centrism}}
* {{wpl|participatory democracy}} }}
* {{wpl|participatory democracy}} }}
|-
|-
| style="background:{{G-RCP/meta/color}}"|
| style="background:#FADFAD"|
|{{G-RCP}} (RCP)
|Reformist Centre Party (RCP)
|{{wpl|Reformism}}
|{{wpl|Reformism}}
|-
|-
| style="background:{{G-IPR/meta/color}}"|
| style="background:#FF7F50"|
|{{G-IPR}} (IPR)
|Independent Progress Rally (IPR)
|{{flatlist|
|{{flatlist|
* {{wpl|Progressivism}}
* {{wpl|Progressivism}}
* {{wpl|participism}} }}
* {{wpl|participism}} }}
|-
|-
| style="background:{{G-CCM/meta/color}}"|
| style="background:#F88379"|
|{{G-CCM}} (CCM)
|Centre of Constitutional Monarchists (CCM)
|[[Conservatism in Gylias#Conservative monarchism|Constitutional monarchism]]
|[[Conservatism in Gylias#Conservative monarchism|Constitutional monarchism]]
|}
|}
Line 91: Line 91:
| 878.120
| 878.120
| 19,3%
| 19,3%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|55|285}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|55|285}}
| 899.864
| 899.864
| 19,8%
| 19,8%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|72|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|72|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 100: Line 100:
| 1.061.806
| 1.061.806
| 18,6%
| 18,6%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|59|285}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|59|285}}
| 977.745
| 977.745
| 17,2%
| 17,2%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|68|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|68|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 109: Line 109:
| 722.863
| 722.863
| 10,3%
| 10,3%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|32|395}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|32|395}}
| 793.491
| 793.491
| 11,3%
| 11,3%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|50|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 118: Line 118:
| 878.606
| 878.606
| 11,1%
| 11,1%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|33|395}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|33|395}}
| 791.323
| 791.323
| 10,0%
| 10,0%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|40|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|40|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 127: Line 127:
| rowspan=2 | 1.049.831
| rowspan=2 | 1.049.831
| rowspan=2 | 11,9%
| rowspan=2 | 11,9%
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|54|520}}
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|54|520}}
| rowspan=2 | 1.014.645
| rowspan=2 | 1.014.645
| rowspan=2 | 11,5%
| rowspan=2 | 11,5%
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|44|300}}
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|44|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 138: Line 138:
| 1.378.149
| 1.378.149
| 14,0%
| 14,0%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|55|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|55|500}}
| 1.210.680
| 1.210.680
| 12,3%
| 12,3%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|50|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 147: Line 147:
| 1.509.680
| 1.509.680
| 13,9%
| 13,9%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|53|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|53|500}}
| 1.346.493
| 1.346.493
| 12,4%
| 12,4%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|50|300}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 156: Line 156:
| 1.728.305
| 1.728.305
| 14,2%
| 14,2%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|60|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|60|500}}
| rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A
| rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
Line 163: Line 163:
| 1.779.757
| 1.779.757
| 13,5%
| 13,5%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|57|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|59|500}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 169: Line 169:
| 2.014.207
| 2.014.207
| 13,9%
| 13,9%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|64|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 175: Line 175:
| 2.109.053
| 2.109.053
| 13,2%
| 13,2%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|64|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
Line 181: Line 181:
| 2.333.179
| 2.333.179
| 13,3%
| 13,3%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|63|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
| {{No2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
! [[Gylian federal election, 2020|2020]]
! [[Gylian federal election, 2020|2020]]
| TBD
| 2.790.471
| XX,X%
| 14,6%
| {{Composition bar|hex={{G-CG/meta/color}}|81|500}}
| {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|54|500}}
| {{Yes2|[[Lena Haidynraix government|Coalition]]}}
| {{Yes2|[[Lena Haidynraix government|Coalition]]}}
|}
|}


===Regional elections===
===Regional elections===
{{main|List of Gylian regional elections}}


===Municipal elections===
===Municipal elections===
{{main|List of Gylian municipal elections}}
{{main|List of Gylian municipal elections}}
{{Gylian political parties}}


[[Category:Gylian political parties]]
[[Category:Gylian political parties]]

Latest revision as of 11:55, 18 December 2024

Centre Group
Founded1960
Ideology
Political positionCentre
Historical:
Centre to Centre-right
Colors  Orange

The Centre Group (French reformed: Groupe centriste) is an electoral bloc of centrist parties in Gylias. Formed in 1960, it is the main centrist electoral bloc in Gylias.

History

The bloc was formed by the Moderate Centrist Party and Rally of the Democratic Centre after electoral reform in 1960. Motivated by their narrow entrance into the Popular Assembly in 1958, it was the first electoral bloc established in Gylias.

Due to the "constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle within Gylian conservatism, many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean centre-right in its early years. It performed respectably in the 1962 and 1969 federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader Sasa Ruişela proved a Beatrice Albini-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics.

The destruction of the Conservative Coalition after the 1969 federal election and its replacement by the National Bloc ushered in a political realignment. Many centre-right politicians previously elected under other banners joined the NB parties instead. While this left the CG as a purely centrist formation, it also meant a reduction in support after the departure of its centre-right voters.

Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the wretched decade, as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the Aén Ďanez government.

Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government.

The 1990 federal election proved to be a breakthrough for Non-inscrits, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. The CG's long record in opposition proved beneficial, and it largely retained its existing support.

During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the Mathilde Vieira government depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14%.

Composition

Party Main ideology
Moderate Centrist Party (MCP)
Rally of the Democratic Centre (RDC)
Reformist Centre Party (RCP) Reformism
Independent Progress Rally (IPR)
Centre of Constitutional Monarchists (CCM) Constitutional monarchism

Ideology

The CG is the main centrist bloc of Gylian politics, complemented by various centrist Non-inscrits. The bloc includes parties with social liberal, reformist, participist, and radical centrist positions. It is considered centre.

Common platform planks include support for emancipated markets, social liberalism, progressivism, participism, reformism, and decentralisation.

Symbols

The CG uses the colour orange as its common colour.

Electoral results

Gylian Parliament

Election Chamber of Deputies Senate Government
FPV % Seats FPV % Seats
1962 878.120 19,3%
55 / 285
899.864 19,8%
72 / 300
Opposition
1969 1.061.806 18,6%
59 / 285
977.745 17,2%
68 / 300
Opposition
1976 722.863 10,3%
32 / 395
793.491 11,3%
50 / 300
Opposition
1980 878.606 11,1%
33 / 395
791.323 10,0%
40 / 300
Opposition
1985 1.049.831 11,9%
54 / 520
1.014.645 11,5%
44 / 300
Opposition
Coalition
1990 1.378.149 14,0%
55 / 500
1.210.680 12,3%
50 / 300
Opposition
1995 1.509.680 13,9%
53 / 500
1.346.493 12,4%
50 / 300
Opposition
2000 1.728.305 14,2%
60 / 500
N/A Opposition
2004 1.779.757 13,5%
59 / 500
Opposition
2008 2.014.207 13,9%
64 / 500
Opposition
2012 2.109.053 13,2%
64 / 500
Opposition
2016 2.333.179 13,3%
64 / 500
Opposition
2020 2.790.471 14,6%
54 / 500
Coalition

Regional elections

Municipal elections