Centre Group (Gylias): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox political party | {{Infobox political party | ||
| name = Centre Group | | name = Centre Group | ||
| colorcode = | | colorcode = #FFA500 | ||
| logo = | | logo = | ||
| foundation = 1960 | | foundation = 1960 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* {{wpl|Progressivism}} | * {{wpl|Progressivism}} | ||
* {{wpl|Reformism}} }} | * {{wpl|Reformism}} }} | ||
| position = '''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Centrism|Centre}} to {{wpl|Centre-right politics|Centre-right | | position = {{wpl|Centrism|Centre}}<br>'''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Centrism|Centre}} to {{wpl|Centre-right politics|Centre-right}} | ||
| colors = {{Color box| | | colors = {{Color box|#FFA500|border=darkgray}} Orange | ||
| country = Gylias | | country = Gylias | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The bloc was formed by the | The bloc was formed by the Moderate Centrist Party and Rally of the Democratic Centre after [[Law on Electoral Representation of 1960|electoral reform]] in 1960. Motivated by their narrow entrance into the [[Gylian Parliament|Popular Assembly]] in [[Gylian federal election, 1958|1958]], it was the first {{wpl|electoral bloc}} established in Gylias. | ||
Due to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Free Territories|"constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle]] within [[Conservatism in Gylias|Gylian conservatism]], many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean {{wpl|Centre-right politics|centre-right}} in its early years. It performed respectably in the [[Gylian federal election, 1962|1962]] and [[Gylian federal election, 1969|1969]] federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader [[Sasa Ruişela]] proved a [[Beatrice Albini]]-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics. | Due to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Free Territories|"constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle]] within [[Conservatism in Gylias|Gylian conservatism]], many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean {{wpl|Centre-right politics|centre-right}} in its early years. It performed respectably in the [[Gylian federal election, 1962|1962]] and [[Gylian federal election, 1969|1969]] federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader [[Sasa Ruişela]] proved a [[Beatrice Albini]]-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the [[wretched decade]], as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the [[Aén Ďanez government]]. | Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the [[wretched decade]], as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the [[Aén Ďanez government]]. | ||
Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government. | Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the [[Ossorian war crisis]] of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government. | ||
The [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]] proved to be a breakthrough for {{G-NI}}, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. The CG's long record in opposition proved beneficial, and it largely retained its existing support. | The [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]] proved to be a breakthrough for {{G-NI}}, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. The CG's long record in opposition proved beneficial, and it largely retained its existing support. | ||
During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14% | During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14%. | ||
==Composition== | ==Composition== | ||
Line 39: | Line 37: | ||
!Main ideology | !Main ideology | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#FFBF00"| | ||
| | |Moderate Centrist Party (MCP) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |{{flatlist| | ||
* {{wpl|Centrism}} | * {{wpl|Centrism}} | ||
* [[Liberalism in Gylias|social liberalism]] }} | * [[Liberalism in Gylias|social liberalism]] }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#EAA221"| | ||
| | |Rally of the Democratic Centre (RDC) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |{{flatlist| | ||
* {{wpl|Radical centrism}} | * {{wpl|Radical centrism}} | ||
* {{wpl|participatory democracy}} }} | * {{wpl|participatory democracy}} }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#FADFAD"| | ||
| | |Reformist Centre Party (RCP) | ||
|{{wpl|Reformism}} | |{{wpl|Reformism}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#FF7F50"| | ||
| | |Independent Progress Rally (IPR) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |{{flatlist| | ||
* {{wpl|Progressivism}} | * {{wpl|Progressivism}} | ||
* {{wpl|participism}} }} | * {{wpl|participism}} }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#F88379"| | ||
| | |Centre of Constitutional Monarchists (CCM) | ||
|[[Conservatism in Gylias#Conservative monarchism|Constitutional monarchism]] | |[[Conservatism in Gylias#Conservative monarchism|Constitutional monarchism]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 93: | Line 91: | ||
| 878.120 | | 878.120 | ||
| 19,3% | | 19,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|55|285}} | ||
| 899.864 | | 899.864 | ||
| 19,8% | | 19,8% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|72|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 102: | Line 100: | ||
| 1.061.806 | | 1.061.806 | ||
| 18,6% | | 18,6% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|59|285}} | ||
| 977.745 | | 977.745 | ||
| 17,2% | | 17,2% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|68|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 111: | Line 109: | ||
| 722.863 | | 722.863 | ||
| 10,3% | | 10,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|32|395}} | ||
| 793.491 | | 793.491 | ||
| 11,3% | | 11,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 120: | Line 118: | ||
| 878.606 | | 878.606 | ||
| 11,1% | | 11,1% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|33|395}} | ||
| 791.323 | | 791.323 | ||
| 10,0% | | 10,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|40|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 129: | Line 127: | ||
| rowspan=2 | 1.049.831 | | rowspan=2 | 1.049.831 | ||
| rowspan=2 | 11,9% | | rowspan=2 | 11,9% | ||
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex= | | rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|54|520}} | ||
| rowspan=2 | 1.014.645 | | rowspan=2 | 1.014.645 | ||
| rowspan=2 | 11,5% | | rowspan=2 | 11,5% | ||
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex= | | rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|44|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 140: | Line 138: | ||
| 1.378.149 | | 1.378.149 | ||
| 14,0% | | 14,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|55|500}} | ||
| 1.210.680 | | 1.210.680 | ||
| 12,3% | | 12,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 149: | Line 147: | ||
| 1.509.680 | | 1.509.680 | ||
| 13,9% | | 13,9% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|53|500}} | ||
| 1.346.493 | | 1.346.493 | ||
| 12,4% | | 12,4% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|50|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 158: | Line 156: | ||
| 1.728.305 | | 1.728.305 | ||
| 14,2% | | 14,2% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|60|500}} | ||
| rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A | | rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
Line 165: | Line 163: | ||
| 1.779.757 | | 1.779.757 | ||
| 13,5% | | 13,5% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|59|500}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 171: | Line 169: | ||
| 2.014.207 | | 2.014.207 | ||
| 13,9% | | 13,9% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 177: | Line 175: | ||
| 2.109.053 | | 2.109.053 | ||
| 13,2% | | 13,2% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 183: | Line 181: | ||
| 2.333.179 | | 2.333.179 | ||
| 13,3% | | 13,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|64|500}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 189: | Line 187: | ||
| 2.790.471 | | 2.790.471 | ||
| 14,6% | | 14,6% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#FFA500|54|500}} | ||
| {{Yes2|[[Lena Haidynraix government|Coalition]]}} | | {{Yes2|[[Lena Haidynraix government|Coalition]]}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Regional elections=== | ===Regional elections=== | ||
{{main|List of Gylian regional elections}} | |||
===Municipal elections=== | ===Municipal elections=== | ||
{{main|List of Gylian municipal elections}} | {{main|List of Gylian municipal elections}} | ||
{{Gylian political parties}} | |||
[[Category:Gylian political parties]] | [[Category:Gylian political parties]] |
Latest revision as of 11:55, 18 December 2024
Centre Group | |
---|---|
Founded | 1960 |
Ideology | |
Political position | Centre Historical: Centre to Centre-right |
Colors | Orange |
The Centre Group (French reformed: Groupe centriste) is an electoral bloc of centrist parties in Gylias. Formed in 1960, it is the main centrist electoral bloc in Gylias.
History
The bloc was formed by the Moderate Centrist Party and Rally of the Democratic Centre after electoral reform in 1960. Motivated by their narrow entrance into the Popular Assembly in 1958, it was the first electoral bloc established in Gylias.
Due to the "constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle within Gylian conservatism, many "constructives" joined the CG, causing it to lean centre-right in its early years. It performed respectably in the 1962 and 1969 federal elections, forming the official opposition. Its first leader Sasa Ruişela proved a Beatrice Albini-like figure, commanding broad public respect that failed to translate to the ballot box. Her sympathy with the centre-right leanings of the CG frustrated centrists who saw this as a hijacking of the CG's declared aim to occupy the centre ground of politics.
The destruction of the Conservative Coalition after the 1969 federal election and its replacement by the National Bloc ushered in a political realignment. Many centre-right politicians previously elected under other banners joined the NB parties instead. While this left the CG as a purely centrist formation, it also meant a reduction in support after the departure of its centre-right voters.
Weaker leadership, timid policies, and overt reliance on ideological "equidistance" hurt the bloc during the wretched decade, as the NB seized the mantle of opposition to the Aén Ďanez government.
Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government. This marked the CG's first participation in a federal government.
The 1990 federal election proved to be a breakthrough for Non-inscrits, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. The CG's long record in opposition proved beneficial, and it largely retained its existing support.
During the 1990s–2000s, the CG had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the Mathilde Vieira government depending on issues. Its federal support stabilised around a core of 13–14%.
Composition
Party | Main ideology | |
---|---|---|
Moderate Centrist Party (MCP) | ||
Rally of the Democratic Centre (RDC) | ||
Reformist Centre Party (RCP) | Reformism | |
Independent Progress Rally (IPR) | ||
Centre of Constitutional Monarchists (CCM) | Constitutional monarchism |
Ideology
The CG is the main centrist bloc of Gylian politics, complemented by various centrist Non-inscrits. The bloc includes parties with social liberal, reformist, participist, and radical centrist positions. It is considered centre.
Common platform planks include support for emancipated markets, social liberalism, progressivism, participism, reformism, and decentralisation.
Symbols
The CG uses the colour orange as its common colour.
Electoral results
Gylian Parliament
Election | Chamber of Deputies | Senate | Government | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPV | % | Seats | FPV | % | Seats | ||
1962 | 878.120 | 19,3% | 55 / 285
|
899.864 | 19,8% | 72 / 300
|
Opposition |
1969 | 1.061.806 | 18,6% | 59 / 285
|
977.745 | 17,2% | 68 / 300
|
Opposition |
1976 | 722.863 | 10,3% | 32 / 395
|
793.491 | 11,3% | 50 / 300
|
Opposition |
1980 | 878.606 | 11,1% | 33 / 395
|
791.323 | 10,0% | 40 / 300
|
Opposition |
1985 | 1.049.831 | 11,9% | 54 / 520
|
1.014.645 | 11,5% | 44 / 300
|
Opposition |
Coalition | |||||||
1990 | 1.378.149 | 14,0% | 55 / 500
|
1.210.680 | 12,3% | 50 / 300
|
Opposition |
1995 | 1.509.680 | 13,9% | 53 / 500
|
1.346.493 | 12,4% | 50 / 300
|
Opposition |
2000 | 1.728.305 | 14,2% | 60 / 500
|
N/A | Opposition | ||
2004 | 1.779.757 | 13,5% | 59 / 500
|
Opposition | |||
2008 | 2.014.207 | 13,9% | 64 / 500
|
Opposition | |||
2012 | 2.109.053 | 13,2% | 64 / 500
|
Opposition | |||
2016 | 2.333.179 | 13,3% | 64 / 500
|
Opposition | |||
2020 | 2.790.471 | 14,6% | 54 / 500
|
Coalition |