National Bloc (Gylias): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The bloc was formed in 1969, after [[Gylian federal election, 1969|that year's federal election]] and the destruction of the {{G-CC}}. The | The bloc was formed in 1969, after [[Gylian federal election, 1969|that year's federal election]] and the destruction of the {{G-CC}}. The CNP took the initiative in forming the bloc, and was joined by four further parties. Its establishment ended [[Conservatism in Gylias|Gylian conservatism]]'s [[Conservatism in Gylias#Free Territories|"constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle]], with the "constructives" victorious. | ||
The NB's creation triggered a political realignment, bringing together the centre-right electorate previously dispersed among the {{G-CG}} and various {{G-NI}} and {{wpl|independent politician|independents}}. Led by the glamorous [[Lea Kersed]], the NB established itself as a fundamentally {{wpl|progressive conservatism|progressive conservative}} force. Following good performances in [[Elections in Gylias#Municipal elections|municipal]], [[Elections in Gylias#Regional elections|regional]], and [[Elections in Gylias#Federal elections|presidential]] elections in the 1970s, it made a strong debut at the [[Gylian federal election, 1976|1976 federal election]], becoming the official opposition. | The NB's creation triggered a political realignment, bringing together the centre-right electorate previously dispersed among the {{G-CG}} and various {{G-NI}} and {{wpl|independent politician|independents}}. Led by the glamorous [[Lea Kersed]], the NB established itself as a fundamentally {{wpl|progressive conservatism|progressive conservative}} force. Following good performances in [[Elections in Gylias#Municipal elections|municipal]], [[Elections in Gylias#Regional elections|regional]], and [[Elections in Gylias#Federal elections|presidential]] elections in the 1970s, it made a strong debut at the [[Gylian federal election, 1976|1976 federal election]], becoming the official opposition. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the [[Ossorian war crisis]] of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government. This marked the NB's first participation in a federal government, and achieved Lea's goal of a grand coalition. | Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the [[Ossorian war crisis]] of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government. This marked the NB's first participation in a federal government, and achieved Lea's goal of a grand coalition. | ||
During the 1980s, a rift developed in the NB between the larger CNP, NPR, and PDU, which remained loyal to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Hannaism|Hannaist]] foundations of Gylian conservatism, and the FEP and IFP, which increasingly moved towards {{wpl|economic liberalism}} and sought to align with [[Populism in Gylias#Right-wing populism|right-wing populists]]. The tensions broke out into the open after Lea's death, culminating in the ''[[dérive au droite]]'' and the FEP and IFP splitting from the NB in 1989 to form the {{G-UFP}}. Their place was taken by the | During the 1980s, a rift developed in the NB between the larger CNP, NPR, and PDU, which remained loyal to the [[Conservatism in Gylias#Hannaism|Hannaist]] foundations of Gylian conservatism, and the FEP and IFP, which increasingly moved towards {{wpl|economic liberalism}} and sought to align with [[Populism in Gylias#Right-wing populism|right-wing populists]]. The tensions broke out into the open after Lea's death, culminating in the ''[[dérive au droite]]'' and the FEP and IFP splitting from the NB in 1989 to form the {{G-UFP}}. Their place was taken by the UND and MRR. | ||
The [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]] proved to be a breakthrough for {{G-NI}}, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. While the NB was well-positioned to gain from its role as standard-bearer of the opposition, the UFP split and exposure of the [[neoliberal conspiracy]] brought negative publicity, and it suffered a drop in support. | The [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]] proved to be a breakthrough for {{G-NI}}, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. While the NB was well-positioned to gain from its role as standard-bearer of the opposition, the UFP split and exposure of the [[neoliberal conspiracy]] brought negative publicity, and it suffered a drop in support. | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
During the 1990s–2000s, the NB had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. It gradually rebuilt its support to previous levels as the non-inscrit wave receded. | During the 1990s–2000s, the NB had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the [[Mathilde Vieira government]] depending on issues. It gradually rebuilt its support to previous levels as the non-inscrit wave receded. | ||
The NB | The NB was disadvantaged at first by the Latte Revolution. [[Marie-Agnès Delaunay]]'s electoral reform drove the UND and MRR to merge with the NPR and PDU, respectively. It ultimately found its own glamorous leader in [[Maria Lucía De Angelis y Cortés]]. She led the NB to victory in the [[Gylian federal election, 2020|2020 federal election]], and formed a coalition with the CCU. This made her Gylias' first conservative Prime Minister. Her coalition was re-elected in [[Gylian federal election, 2024|2024]]. This decade was coffee and water politics era, with the NB and ENS as the strongest blocs, and the others weakened in comparison. | ||
==Composition== | ==Composition== | ||
{|class=wikitable style=text-align:left | {|class=wikitable style=text-align:left | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 51: | Line 50: | ||
|Popular Democratic Union (PDU) | |Popular Democratic Union (PDU) | ||
|[[Conservatism in Gylias|Progressive conservatism]] | |[[Conservatism in Gylias|Progressive conservatism]] | ||
|} | |||
Former parties were: | |||
{|class=wikitable style=text-align:left | |||
|- | |||
!colspan="2"|Party | |||
!Main ideology | |||
!Period | |||
!Notes | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background:#7DF9FF"| | | style="background:#7DF9FF"| | ||
Line 57: | Line 64: | ||
* [[Conservatism in Gylias|Liberal conservatism]] | * [[Conservatism in Gylias|Liberal conservatism]] | ||
* {{wpl|civic conservatism}} }} | * {{wpl|civic conservatism}} }} | ||
|1989–2010 | |||
|Merged into NPR. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background:#ADD8E6"| | | style="background:#ADD8E6"| | ||
|Movement of Reformists for the Republic (MRR) | |Movement of Reformists for the Republic (MRR) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |||
* [[Liberalism in Gylias#Conservative liberalism|Conservative liberalism]] | * [[Liberalism in Gylias#Conservative liberalism|Conservative liberalism]] | ||
* {{wpl|reformism}} }} | * {{wpl|reformism}} }} | ||
| | |1986–2009 | ||
|Merged into PDU. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#4169E1" | | ||
| | |Free Economy Party (FEP) | ||
|{{wpl|Economic liberalism}} | |{{wpl|Economic liberalism}} | ||
|1969–1989 | |1969–1989 | ||
|Split from the NB to form the {{G-UFP}}. | |Split from the NB to form the {{G-UFP}}. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#1DACD6" | | ||
| | |Independent Freedom Party (IFP) | ||
|'''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Liberal corporatism}}<br>''' | |'''Historical''':<br>{{wpl|Liberal corporatism}}<br>'''Later''':<br>{{wpl|Neoliberalism}} | ||
|1969–1989 | |1969–1989 | ||
|Split from the NB to form the {{G-UFP}}. | |Split from the NB to form the {{G-UFP}}. | ||
Line 87: | Line 89: | ||
==Ideology== | ==Ideology== | ||
The NB is the main conservative bloc of [[Politics of Gylias|Gylian politics]], complemented by various conservative {{G-NI}}. The bloc includes parties with [[Conservatism in Gylias#Hannaism|Hannaist]], {{wpl|paternalistic conservatism|paternalistic}}, {{wpl|liberal conservatism|liberal}}, and {{wpl|progressive conservatism|progressive conservative}} positions. It is {{wpl|centre-right politics|centre-right | The NB is the main conservative bloc of [[Politics of Gylias|Gylian politics]], complemented by various conservative {{G-NI}}. The bloc includes parties with [[Conservatism in Gylias#Hannaism|Hannaist]], {{wpl|paternalistic conservatism|paternalistic}}, {{wpl|liberal conservatism|liberal}}, and {{wpl|progressive conservatism|progressive conservative}} positions. It is {{wpl|centre-right politics|centre-right}}. | ||
Common platform planks include support for {{wpl|paternalistic conservatism|paternalism}}, the {{wpl|welfare state}}, {{wpl|social corporatism}}, {{wpl|communitarianism}}, {{wpl|social liberalism}}, {{wpl|progressivism}}, and {{wpl|reformism}}. | Common platform planks include support for {{wpl|paternalistic conservatism|paternalism}}, the {{wpl|welfare state}}, {{wpl|social corporatism}}, {{wpl|communitarianism}}, {{wpl|social liberalism}}, {{wpl|progressivism}}, and {{wpl|reformism}}. | ||
==Symbols== | ==Symbols== | ||
The NB uses | The NB uses the common colour light blue, and the common symbol, a waterfall. This contributed to the nickname of the coffee and water politics era. | ||
==Electoral results== | ==Electoral results== | ||
===Gylian Parliament=== | ===Gylian Parliament=== | ||
{|class=wikitable style="text-align:center; font-size: 80%;" | |||
! rowspan=2| Election | ==== First Republic ==== | ||
! colspan=3| [[Gylian Chamber of Deputies|Chamber of Deputies]] | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size: 80%;" | ||
! colspan=3| [[Gylian Senate|Senate]] | ! rowspan="2" | Election | ||
! rowspan=2| Government | ! colspan="3" | [[Gylian Chamber of Deputies|Chamber of Deputies]] | ||
! colspan="3" | [[Gylian Senate|Senate]] | |||
! rowspan="2" | Government | |||
|- | |- | ||
! {{abbr|FPV|First preference votes}} | ! {{abbr|FPV|First preference votes}} | ||
Line 128: | Line 132: | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=2 | [[Gylian federal election, 1985|1985]] | ! rowspan="2" | [[Gylian federal election, 1985|1985]] | ||
| rowspan=2 | 2.119.758 | | rowspan="2" | 2.119.758 | ||
| rowspan=2 | 24,0% | | rowspan="2" | 24,0% | ||
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|100|520}} | | rowspan="2" | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|100|520}} | ||
| rowspan=2 | 1.888.122 | | rowspan="2" | 1.888.122 | ||
| rowspan=2 | 21,4% | | rowspan="2" | 21,4% | ||
| rowspan=2 | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|70|300}} | | rowspan="2" | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|70|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 161: | Line 165: | ||
| 20,0% | | 20,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|64|500}} | | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|64|500}} | ||
| | | colspan="3" rowspan="2" style="background:lightgrey" | N/A | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 169: | Line 173: | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|64|500}} | | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|64|500}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|} | |||
====Second Republic==== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size: 80%;" | |||
! rowspan="2" | Election | |||
! colspan="3" | [[Gylian Chamber of Deputies|Chamber of Deputies]] | |||
! rowspan="2" |Government | |||
|- | |- | ||
! [[Gylian federal election, 2008|2008]] | !{{abbr|FPV|First preference votes}} | ||
| 2. | ! % | ||
| | ! Seats | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|68|500}} | |- | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | ![[Gylian federal election, 2008|2008]] | ||
|2.173.605 | |||
|15,0% | |||
|{{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|68|500}} | |||
|{{No2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |||
![[Gylian federal election, 2012|2012]] | |||
| 1.613.745 | |||
|10,1% | |||
|{{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|34|382}} | |||
|{{No2|Opposition}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
! [[Gylian federal election, | ![[Gylian federal election, 2016|2016]] | ||
| | |1.982.325 | ||
| | |11,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC| | |{{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|42|380}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | |{{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [[Gylian federal election, | ![[Gylian federal election, 2020|2020]] | ||
| | |9.044.811 | ||
| | |47,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC| | | {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|177|384}} | ||
| {{ | |{{Yes2|[[Maria Lucía De Angelis y Cortés government|Coalition]]}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [[Gylian federal election, | ![[Gylian federal election, 2024|2024]] | ||
| | |9.681.742 | ||
| | | 48,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC| | |{{Composition bar|hex=#0087DC|180|368}} | ||
| {{Yes2|[[ | |{{Yes2|[[Maria Lucía De Angelis y Cortés government|Coalition]]}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 31 December 2024
National Bloc | |
---|---|
Founded | 1969 |
Ideology | |
Political position | Centre-right to right-wing |
Colors | Light blue |
The National Bloc (French reformed: Bloc nationale) is an electoral bloc of conservative parties in Gylias. Formed in 1969, it is the main conservative electoral bloc in Gylias.
History
The bloc was formed in 1969, after that year's federal election and the destruction of the Conservative Coalition. The CNP took the initiative in forming the bloc, and was joined by four further parties. Its establishment ended Gylian conservatism's "constructive"–"recalcitrant" battle, with the "constructives" victorious.
The NB's creation triggered a political realignment, bringing together the centre-right electorate previously dispersed among the Centre Group and various Non-inscrits and independents. Led by the glamorous Lea Kersed, the NB established itself as a fundamentally progressive conservative force. Following good performances in municipal, regional, and presidential elections in the 1970s, it made a strong debut at the 1976 federal election, becoming the official opposition.
The NB's support grew during the wretched decade. Lea was a tenacious opponent of the Aén Ďanez government, and repeatedly pushed for a grand coalition of conservatives, leftists, liberals, and centrists against authoritarianism of the left and right. She led the bloc to its best election result in 1985, winning a plurality of first preference votes and seats for the first time.
Opposition disunity allowed Aén to remain in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, after which the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government. This marked the NB's first participation in a federal government, and achieved Lea's goal of a grand coalition.
During the 1980s, a rift developed in the NB between the larger CNP, NPR, and PDU, which remained loyal to the Hannaist foundations of Gylian conservatism, and the FEP and IFP, which increasingly moved towards economic liberalism and sought to align with right-wing populists. The tensions broke out into the open after Lea's death, culminating in the dérive au droite and the FEP and IFP splitting from the NB in 1989 to form the Union for Freedom and Prosperity. Their place was taken by the UND and MRR.
The 1990 federal election proved to be a breakthrough for Non-inscrits, as voters punished the established blocs for their role in the wretched decade. While the NB was well-positioned to gain from its role as standard-bearer of the opposition, the UFP split and exposure of the neoliberal conspiracy brought negative publicity, and it suffered a drop in support.
During the 1990s–2000s, the NB had an ambiguous role, alternately providing outside support for and opposing the Mathilde Vieira government depending on issues. It gradually rebuilt its support to previous levels as the non-inscrit wave receded.
The NB was disadvantaged at first by the Latte Revolution. Marie-Agnès Delaunay's electoral reform drove the UND and MRR to merge with the NPR and PDU, respectively. It ultimately found its own glamorous leader in Maria Lucía De Angelis y Cortés. She led the NB to victory in the 2020 federal election, and formed a coalition with the CCU. This made her Gylias' first conservative Prime Minister. Her coalition was re-elected in 2024. This decade was coffee and water politics era, with the NB and ENS as the strongest blocs, and the others weakened in comparison.
Composition
Party | Main ideology | |
---|---|---|
Civic National Party (CNP) | ||
National Party of the Republic (NPR) | Liberal conservatism | |
Popular Democratic Union (PDU) | Progressive conservatism |
Former parties were:
Party | Main ideology | Period | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Union for National Democracy (UND) | 1989–2010 | Merged into NPR. | ||
Movement of Reformists for the Republic (MRR) | 1986–2009 | Merged into PDU. | ||
Free Economy Party (FEP) | Economic liberalism | 1969–1989 | Split from the NB to form the Union for Freedom and Prosperity. | |
Independent Freedom Party (IFP) | Historical: Liberal corporatism Later: Neoliberalism |
1969–1989 | Split from the NB to form the Union for Freedom and Prosperity. |
Ideology
The NB is the main conservative bloc of Gylian politics, complemented by various conservative Non-inscrits. The bloc includes parties with Hannaist, paternalistic, liberal, and progressive conservative positions. It is centre-right.
Common platform planks include support for paternalism, the welfare state, social corporatism, communitarianism, social liberalism, progressivism, and reformism.
Symbols
The NB uses the common colour light blue, and the common symbol, a waterfall. This contributed to the nickname of the coffee and water politics era.
Electoral results
Gylian Parliament
First Republic
Election | Chamber of Deputies | Senate | Government | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPV | % | Seats | FPV | % | Seats | ||
1976 | 1.348.847 | 19,1% | 60 / 395
|
1.068.063 | 15,1% | 55 / 300
|
Opposition |
1980 | 1.599.031 | 20,2% | 68 / 395
|
1.265.821 | 16,0% | 64 / 300
|
Opposition |
1985 | 2.119.758 | 24,0% | 100 / 520
|
1.888.122 | 21,4% | 70 / 300
|
Opposition |
Coalition | |||||||
1990 | 1.771.906 | 18,0% | 60 / 500
|
1.594.554 | 16,2% | 55 / 300
|
Opposition |
1995 | 1.976.703 | 18,2% | 62 / 500
|
1.769.987 | 16,3% | 58 / 300
|
Opposition |
2000 | 2.434.233 | 20,0% | 64 / 500
|
N/A | Opposition | ||
2004 | 2.702.594 | 20,5% | 64 / 500
|
Opposition |
Second Republic
Election | Chamber of Deputies | Government | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FPV | % | Seats | ||
2008 | 2.173.605 | 15,0% | 68 / 500
|
Opposition |
2012 | 1.613.745 | 10,1% | 34 / 382
|
Opposition |
2016 | 1.982.325 | 11,3% | 42 / 380
|
Opposition |
2020 | 9.044.811 | 47,0% | 177 / 384
|
Coalition |
2024 | 9.681.742 | 48,0% | 180 / 368
|
Coalition |