Revolutionary Rally (Gylias): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| logo = | | logo = | ||
| foundation = 1961 | | foundation = 1961 | ||
| dissolution = 2010 | |||
| ideology = {{plainlist| | | ideology = {{plainlist| | ||
* [[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | * [[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
The bloc was established in 1961, soon after [[Law on Electoral Representation of 1960|electoral reform]] and the emergence of other blocs. The | The bloc was established in 1961, soon after [[Law on Electoral Representation of 1960|electoral reform]] and the emergence of other blocs. The Radical Communist Rally took the initiative in its creation. | ||
The RR was the heir to the statist–authoritarian left current that had been suppressed by [[Anarchism in Gylias|anarchists]] in the [[Lucian Purge]]. As a result, it was marginalised during the [[Golden Revolution]], having a negligible presence in [[Gylian Parliament|Parliament]]. They were seen as "{{wpl|old left}} dinosaurs" in the 1960s, fixated on economics and {{wpl|reactionary}} on social issues. | The RR was the heir to the statist–authoritarian left current that had been suppressed by [[Anarchism in Gylias|anarchists]] in the [[Lucian Purge]]. As a result, it was marginalised during the [[Golden Revolution]], having a negligible presence in [[Gylian Parliament|Parliament]]. They were seen as "{{wpl|old left}} dinosaurs" in the 1960s, fixated on economics and {{wpl|reactionary}} on social issues. | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
The coalition was marred by bitterness between the RR and PA; both attempted to undermine the other. Aén's attempts to push Gylias towards a more statist leftist model caused conflicts with local governments and civil society, and thus were mainly responsible for the crises of the [[wretched decade]]. The PA's attempts to "restrain" the RR in office failed, and the RR kept its plurality in the [[Gylian federal election, 1980|1980 federal election]], largely due to a base-focused campaign. However, it failed to weaken the PA, and was thus forced to resume the coalition. | The coalition was marred by bitterness between the RR and PA; both attempted to undermine the other. Aén's attempts to push Gylias towards a more statist leftist model caused conflicts with local governments and civil society, and thus were mainly responsible for the crises of the [[wretched decade]]. The PA's attempts to "restrain" the RR in office failed, and the RR kept its plurality in the [[Gylian federal election, 1980|1980 federal election]], largely due to a base-focused campaign. However, it failed to weaken the PA, and was thus forced to resume the coalition. | ||
The RR expelled the PA from the coalition in 1983, reducing itself to a minority government. It mounted an aggressive and negative campaign in the [[Gylian federal election, 1985|1985 federal election]], where it managed to cling to third place. The resulting {{wpl|hung parliament}} and opposition disunity allowed the RR to stay in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, when the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. | The RR expelled the PA from the coalition in 1983, reducing itself to a minority government. It mounted an aggressive and negative campaign in the [[Gylian federal election, 1985|1985 federal election]], where it managed to cling to third place. The resulting {{wpl|hung parliament}} and opposition disunity allowed the RR to stay in office as a caretaker until the [[Ossorian war crisis]] of 1986, when the opposition banded together and formed the [[Filomena Pinheiro government]]. | ||
The Filomena Pinheiro government cracked down on authoritarianism, both of the far-right FROS and far-left RR. RR was subject to a media blackout and a campaign of relentless public humiliation and investigations, leading to most of its officeholders being recalled, removed from office, investigated, or convicted of various crimes and sentenced to [[Law of Gylias#Penal law|''dégradation civique'']] or [[Law of Gylias#Penal law|expulsion from the community]] in [[social quarantine area]]s. | The Filomena Pinheiro government cracked down on authoritarianism, both of the far-right FROS and far-left RR. RR was subject to a media blackout and a campaign of relentless public humiliation and investigations, leading to most of its officeholders being recalled, removed from office, investigated, or convicted of various crimes and sentenced to [[Law of Gylias#Penal law|''dégradation civique'']] or [[Law of Gylias#Penal law|expulsion from the community]] in [[social quarantine area]]s. | ||
The concerted crackdown and public revulsion at the [[wretched decade]] destroyed the RR as a political force. It lost all its seats in the [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]], and has not held any office since. | The concerted crackdown and public revulsion at the [[wretched decade]] destroyed the RR as a political force. It lost all its seats in the [[Gylian federal election, 1990|1990 federal election]], and has not held any office since. | ||
The [[Gylian administrative agencies#Ministry of Justice|Directorate for Protection of the Constitution]] banned it and all its parties in 2010, as ordered by the [[Marie-Agnès Delaunay government]]. | |||
==Composition== | ==Composition== | ||
Line 35: | Line 38: | ||
!Main ideology | !Main ideology | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#660000"| | ||
| | |Revolutionary Workers' Party (RWP) | ||
|[[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | |[[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#B22222"| | ||
| | |Workers' Liberation Front (WLF) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |{{flatlist| | ||
* [[Socialism in Gylias|Authoritarian socialism]] | * [[Socialism in Gylias|Authoritarian socialism]] | ||
* {{wpl|workerism}} }} | * {{wpl|workerism}} }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#960018"| | ||
| | |Proletarian Revolutionary Vanguard (PRV) | ||
|[[Communism in Gylias|Agrarian communism]] | |[[Communism in Gylias|Agrarian communism]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#800000"| | ||
| | |Radical Communist Rally (RCR) | ||
|{{flatlist| | |{{flatlist| | ||
* [[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | * [[Communism in Gylias|Statist communism]] | ||
* {{wpl|Blanquism|putschism}} }} | * {{wpl|Blanquism|putschism}} }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="background: | | style="background:#E34234"| | ||
| | |Rally of Militant Proletarians (RMP) | ||
|[[Socialism in Gylias|Statist socialism]] | |[[Socialism in Gylias|Statist socialism]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 87: | Line 90: | ||
| 92.910 | | 92.910 | ||
| 2,0% | | 2,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|5|285}} | ||
| 92.995 | | 92.995 | ||
| 2,0% | | 2,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 96: | Line 99: | ||
| 85.410 | | 85.410 | ||
| 1,5% | | 1,5% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|2|285}} | ||
| 84.814 | | 84.814 | ||
| 1,5% | | 1,5% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 105: | Line 108: | ||
| 1.491.438 | | 1.491.438 | ||
| 21,2% | | 21,2% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|84|395}} | ||
| 869.898 | | 869.898 | ||
| 12,3% | | 12,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|39|300}} | ||
| {{Yes2|[[Aén Ďanez government|Coalition]]}} | | {{Yes2|[[Aén Ďanez government|Coalition]]}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 114: | Line 117: | ||
| 1.666.422 | | 1.666.422 | ||
| 21,1% | | 21,1% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|85|395}} | ||
| 933.131 | | 933.131 | ||
| 11,8% | | 11,8% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|40|300}} | ||
| {{Yes2|[[Aén Ďanez government|Coalition]]}} | | {{Yes2|[[Aén Ďanez government|Coalition]]}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 123: | Line 126: | ||
| 1.349.869 | | 1.349.869 | ||
| 15,3% | | 15,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|70|520}} | ||
| 855.831 | | 855.831 | ||
| 9,7% | | 9,7% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|32|300}} | ||
| {{No2|Opposition}} | | {{No2|Opposition}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 132: | Line 135: | ||
| 127.971 | | 127.971 | ||
| 1,3% | | 1,3% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
| 78.743 | | 78.743 | ||
| 0,8% | | 0,8% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|300}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 141: | Line 144: | ||
| 108.610 | | 108.610 | ||
| 1,0% | | 1,0% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
| 65.153 | | 65.153 | ||
| 0,6% | | 0,6% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|300}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 150: | Line 153: | ||
| 73.027 | | 73.027 | ||
| 0,6% | | 0,6% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
| rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A | | rowspan=6 colspan=3 style="background:lightgrey"| N/A | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
Line 157: | Line 160: | ||
| 65.917 | | 65.917 | ||
| 0,5% | | 0,5% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 163: | Line 166: | ||
| 57.963 | | 57.963 | ||
| 0,4% | | 0,4% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 169: | Line 172: | ||
| 63.911 | | 63.911 | ||
| 0,4% | | 0,4% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 175: | Line 178: | ||
| 70.171 | | 70.171 | ||
| 0,4% | | 0,4% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 181: | Line 184: | ||
| 76.451 | | 76.451 | ||
| 0,4% | | 0,4% | ||
| {{Composition bar|hex= | | {{Composition bar|hex=#B31B1B|0|500}} | ||
|{{N/A|No seats}} | |{{N/A|No seats}} | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 11:53, 18 December 2024
Revolutionary Rally | |
---|---|
Founded | 1961 |
Dissolved | 2010 |
Ideology | |
Political position | Far-left |
Colors | Dark red |
The Revolutionary Rally (French reformed: Rassemblement révolutionnaire) is an electoral bloc of statist left parties in Gylias. Formed in 1961, it is the main statist left electoral bloc in Gylias.
History
The bloc was established in 1961, soon after electoral reform and the emergence of other blocs. The Radical Communist Rally took the initiative in its creation.
The RR was the heir to the statist–authoritarian left current that had been suppressed by anarchists in the Lucian Purge. As a result, it was marginalised during the Golden Revolution, having a negligible presence in Parliament. They were seen as "old left dinosaurs" in the 1960s, fixated on economics and reactionary on social issues.
Led by Aén Ďanez, the RR achieved an unexpected breakthrough in the 1976 federal election. They seized the left-wing populist approach and support base of the defunct Movement for Emancipation and Democracy, and capitalised on the disarray of the Progressive Alliance to win a plurality of first preference votes. After a month-long impasse, they formed a coalition with the PA.
The coalition was marred by bitterness between the RR and PA; both attempted to undermine the other. Aén's attempts to push Gylias towards a more statist leftist model caused conflicts with local governments and civil society, and thus were mainly responsible for the crises of the wretched decade. The PA's attempts to "restrain" the RR in office failed, and the RR kept its plurality in the 1980 federal election, largely due to a base-focused campaign. However, it failed to weaken the PA, and was thus forced to resume the coalition.
The RR expelled the PA from the coalition in 1983, reducing itself to a minority government. It mounted an aggressive and negative campaign in the 1985 federal election, where it managed to cling to third place. The resulting hung parliament and opposition disunity allowed the RR to stay in office as a caretaker until the Ossorian war crisis of 1986, when the opposition banded together and formed the Filomena Pinheiro government.
The Filomena Pinheiro government cracked down on authoritarianism, both of the far-right FROS and far-left RR. RR was subject to a media blackout and a campaign of relentless public humiliation and investigations, leading to most of its officeholders being recalled, removed from office, investigated, or convicted of various crimes and sentenced to dégradation civique or expulsion from the community in social quarantine areas.
The concerted crackdown and public revulsion at the wretched decade destroyed the RR as a political force. It lost all its seats in the 1990 federal election, and has not held any office since.
The Directorate for Protection of the Constitution banned it and all its parties in 2010, as ordered by the Marie-Agnès Delaunay government.
Composition
Party | Main ideology | |
---|---|---|
Revolutionary Workers' Party (RWP) | Statist communism | |
Workers' Liberation Front (WLF) | ||
Proletarian Revolutionary Vanguard (PRV) | Agrarian communism | |
Radical Communist Rally (RCR) | ||
Rally of Militant Proletarians (RMP) | Statist socialism |
Ideology
The RR is the main statist left bloc of Gylian politics. It includes parties with statist communist, statist socialist, and putschist positions. It is far-left.
Common platform planks include support for vanguardism, statism, centralised planning, and anti-revisionism.
Symbols
The NB uses a dark shade of red as its common colour.
Electoral results
Gylian Parliament
Election | Chamber of Deputies | Senate | Government | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPV | % | Seats | FPV | % | Seats | ||
1962 | 92.910 | 2,0% | 5 / 285
|
92.995 | 2,0% | 0 / 300
|
Opposition |
1969 | 85.410 | 1,5% | 2 / 285
|
84.814 | 1,5% | 0 / 300
|
Opposition |
1976 | 1.491.438 | 21,2% | 84 / 395
|
869.898 | 12,3% | 39 / 300
|
Coalition |
1980 | 1.666.422 | 21,1% | 85 / 395
|
933.131 | 11,8% | 40 / 300
|
Coalition |
1985 | 1.349.869 | 15,3% | 70 / 520
|
855.831 | 9,7% | 32 / 300
|
Opposition |
1990 | 127.971 | 1,3% | 0 / 500
|
78.743 | 0,8% | 0 / 300
|
No seats |
1995 | 108.610 | 1,0% | 0 / 500
|
65.153 | 0,6% | 0 / 300
|
No seats |
2000 | 73.027 | 0,6% | 0 / 500
|
N/A | No seats | ||
2004 | 65.917 | 0,5% | 0 / 500
|
No seats | |||
2008 | 57.963 | 0,4% | 0 / 500
|
No seats | |||
2012 | 63.911 | 0,4% | 0 / 500
|
No seats | |||
2016 | 70.171 | 0,4% | 0 / 500
|
No seats | |||
2020 | 76.451 | 0,4% | 0 / 500
|
No seats |