Abortion law (Ajax): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Neuleinster (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! style="width:10em;" | On request | ! style="width:10em;" | On request | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="3"|{{flag| | |rowspan="3"|{{flag|Charnea}} | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
| | | Established prior to recorded law, first codified under [[Kaharnism|Kaharnic]] law. | ||
| | | Established prior to recorded law, first codified under [[Kaharnism|Kaharnic]] law. | ||
| Since | | Since 1909 | ||
| | | Established prior to recorded law, first codified under [[Kaharnism|Kaharnic]] law. | ||
| Since | | Since 1909 | ||
| Since | | Since 1968 | ||
| Since | | Since 2014 | ||
|- align="center" | |- align="center" | ||
|colspan="7"| | |colspan="7"| Women and by extension women's issues and reproductive rights are historically prioritized in Charnean tribal society, in which women are more politically influential than men. Fundamental rights to abortion are traditional and predate written legal permissions, and additional abortion rights have been further expanded by successive governments of the Confederation. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="3"|{{flag|Garima}} | |rowspan="3"|{{flag|Garima}} |
Revision as of 17:34, 10 March 2021
Country | To protect woman's life | Physical health | Mental health | Rape | Fetal Defects | Socio-economic factors | On request |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charnea | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Established prior to recorded law, first codified under Kaharnic law. | Established prior to recorded law, first codified under Kaharnic law. | Since 1909 | Established prior to recorded law, first codified under Kaharnic law. | Since 1909 | Since 1968 | Since 2014 | |
Women and by extension women's issues and reproductive rights are historically prioritized in Charnean tribal society, in which women are more politically influential than men. Fundamental rights to abortion are traditional and predate written legal permissions, and additional abortion rights have been further expanded by successive governments of the Confederation. | |||||||
Garima | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial | Partial |
Since 1968 | Since 1968 | Since 1968 | Since 1968 | Since 1968 | Since 1968 | Since 1968 | |
Abortion laws in Garima had varied by state until national legislation was passed in 1968 regulating abortion laws at the national level, recognizing the rights of women to receive an abortion in the events of endangerment to the life of the woman, physical or mental ailments, pregnancy as a result of rape or fetal defects. The states retained the right to allow abortions in other circumstances, including but not limited to socio-economic factors and abortion on-demand, with varying limitations during fetal development. | |||||||
Garza | Yes | Partial | Partial | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Since 1980 | Since 1980 | Since 1980 | Since 1980 | Since 1980 | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion in Garza is legal at the national level provided the pregnancy poses great danger to the life of the woman, if the pregnancy is a result of rape or if the fetus is non-viable. The provinces reserve the right to allow additional reasons based upon physical and mental health of the mother. The 1980 Abortion Act remains controversial to this day and a polarizing political issue in Garza. | |||||||
Gelonia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Since 1975 | Since 1975 | Since 1990 | Since 1975 | Since 1990 | Since 1990 | Since 1990 | |
Abortion under specified circumstances first became legal in 1975. Further restrictions were lifted in 1990. | |||||||
Ghant | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Since 1802 | Never legalized | Never legalized | Since 1802 | Since 1802 | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion in Ghant is banned except in the following three circumstances. 1. When the woman's life or health is endangered by the continuation of pregnancy, 2. When the pregnancy is a result of a criminal act, or 3. When the fetus is seriously malformed. One common loophole is that natural abortifacients are not illegal, so most women can use them without facing criminal charges. | |||||||
Keuland | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion in Keuland is illegal with no exceptions, with maximum sentences of up to 30 years in prison for women attempting them, with lighter sentences for accomplices. Doctors and physicians risk losing their medical licenses, fines and prison sentences. | |||||||
Latium | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Since 1988 | Since 2012 | Since 2012 | Since 2012 | Since 2012 | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion had been originally legalized in 1969, only to be overturned with a complete ban in 1971. It has been a contentious topic since, with the most recent methods for legal abortion being very limited. | |||||||
Lihnidos | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Since 1980 | Never legalized | Never legalized | Since 1980 | Since 1987 | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion in Lihnidos is legal only in extreme circumstances. Abortions can only legally be preformed if the life of the mother is in danger or if the pregnancy was a result of rape. Abortions for fetal defects had been legalized by a Democratic Coalition government in 1980 but was made illegal by a Conservative-National government in 1987. If a woman currently wishes to get an abortion she must be within the first twenty weeks of the pregnancy and is required to go through mandatory counseling. Abortion remains a sensitive topic in Lihnidos. | |||||||
Lyncanestria | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Since 2007 | Since 2007 | Since 1989 | Since 1979 | Since 2013 | Since 1987 | – | |
Abortion legislation varied by state until 1983 when it was legalised on a federal level. Between 1987 and 1989, limitations were placed on abortion, eventually restricting it only to cases of rape. In 2006, the new liberal government began relaxing restrictions on abortion. In 2015 a bill was introduced in parliament that would have reintroduced a number of restrictions; another bill introduced in that same session would have also prohibited abortion without the consent of the biological father. Both bills were defeated. Abortion remains a controversial topic in Lyncanestria. | |||||||
Ostmark | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Since 1942 | Since 1942 | Since 1942 | Since 1942 | Since 1962 | Since 1962 | Since 1982 | |
Abortion was formally legalized in Ostmark in 1942. Abortion in Ostmark was first legislated by the Abortion Act of 1942 This stated that an abortion could be performed in the event that the pregnancy endangered the woman's life, if the pregnancy was the result of rape or if the mother was physically or mentally unfit to rear a child. The law was later expanded in 1962 to include socio-economic factors and risk of serious fetal defects. In 1982 the law was revised further to legalize abortions on demand, with the choice of abortion being entirely up to the woman up to the 22nd week. Abortions after the 22nd week of fetal development may be allowed in cases where the fetus can not survive outside the womb even if it is carried to term. | |||||||
North Ottonia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Since 1950 | Since 1950 | Since 1950 | Since 1950 | Since 1950 | Since 1950 | Since 1950 | |
When the New Foundation of Ottonia legally went into effect on January 1st of 1950, it included an entry in its bill of rights section that guaranteed the right to an abortion. In practice, it is fairly easy to get an abortion for any reason within the first two trimesters of pregnancy, but most doctors will not perform third trimester abortions except for medical necessity (the life of the prospective mother is in danger taking the pregnancy to term, or the fetus has become nonviable) or for pregnancies which are the result of a criminal act. The Republic of Ottonia had kept abortion to protect the life and health of a mother and in instances of rape legal until the Republican government was forced into exile in 1922, whereupon it was replaced by a royalist government which outlawed abortion in all circumstances. | |||||||
South Ottonia | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
1954 | 1954 | Never Legalized | 1991 | 1954 | Never Legalized | Never Legalized | |
Erobran Henrik II legalized abortion to protect the life and physical health of a prospective mother, as well as in instances of rape or severe fetal defect in 1954. However, the rape allowance was overturned by his successor, Wyllem I. It was restored in 1991 by Robyrt I. Prior to the Ottonian Revolution, the royalist government of Ottonia had criminalized abortion under all circumstances upon coming to power in 1918. | |||||||
Sydalon | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Legalized 2015 | Legalized 2015 | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
All abortion was illegal in Sydalon until 2015, when it was legalized to protect a woman's life or threat of physical health. Nonetheless it is still a contentious topic with regular National Assembly bills attempting to legalize abortion in other situations. | |||||||
Thraysia | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion is classified as murder under Thraysian law and is considered to be a grave offense to the right to life. In some circumstances, partaking or assisting in an abortion are punishable by death. Thraysians who receive abortions outside of the nation are usually denied re-entry. | |||||||
Uluujol | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | 1972 | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Prior to 1972 abortion was only lightly regulated although it was taboo in many regions of Uluujol and was in practice harshly restricted by local authorities. In 1972 Khagan Nikan V signed an imperial decree bringing all abortion laws and regulations in the Khaganate to a single standard, outlining the conditions under which abortions could and could not be performed, and proscribing hefty fines and even some light jail sentences for violations. | |||||||
Vardana | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Since 1925 | Since 1925 | Since 1925 | Since 1925 | Since 1925 | Since 1925 | Since 1967 | |
Abortion in Vardana was legalized in 1925, with the addition of abortions on request since 1967. | |||||||
Yisrael | Yes | Yes | Partial | No | No | No | No |
Since the Talmudic era | Since the Talmudic era | Since the early 20th century | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | Never legalized | |
Abortion is only permitted in limited circumstances, chiefly as a last resort if the mother's life, physical health, or mental health, is at serious risk of death. Otherwise, abortion is considered murder and illegal. |