Montecara–Euclean Community relations: Difference between revisions
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
=== Positions of EC member states on Montecaran membership === | === Positions of EC member states on Montecaran membership === | ||
Montecaran membership in the EC was broadly supported by both members of the EC government and the populations of EC member-states. Sitting EC President Smitty Werbenjagerman and members of his cabinet made several visits to Montecara to promote the vote. There were also private discussions in cabinet concerning contracting a marketing firm in Montecara to publish a series of ads on [[VM|Vimo]] rail cars, but ultimately the scheme was considered too expensive with not enough potential impact on the vote. | |||
A small group of nations, however, lead by [[Solstiana|Solstianan]] President Ine Jensen was strongly opposed to the inclusion of Montecara on the basis of a distrust of the government. Jensen believed that Montecaran membership would lead to the further intrusion of private banking interests at the same time that she was promoting policies in the EC which preferred "diminishing partnership" financing. Privately Jensen referred to Montecaran ascension as a "poison pill" which would lead to a decline in the ability of the market to regulate itself with predicted obstructionism from Montecara. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 21:55, 26 August 2020
 | |
 Euclean Community |
 Montecara |
|---|---|
Montecara is not a member of the Euclean Community, but it does have extensive relations with both the Community and its member states.
Movement of goods and people
Montecara and the EC have been in a customs union (with limited exceptions) since 1 January 2001. Goods can move between the EC and Montecara tariff-free, though they are still subject to inspection for health and safety reasons. This includes both material goods and utilities such as drinking water and electricity. As part of their trade agreement, Montecara and the EC agree to respect one another's policies in regard to protected designation of origin and traditional specialty foods. Laws regarding consumer protection, workers' rights, and the environment are generally in harmony, but conformity is not a legal requirement of any current bilateral agreement. The only major area of exception to trade liberalization is agriculture and fisheries, which remain subject to certain quotas and controls.
The EC as a whole is Montecara's largest trading partner in terms of both imports and exports; Montecara relies heavily on the EC for its supplies of such staples as food and consumer goods. The EC is the destination of the majority of Montecara's exports, especially the products of the precision tools, luxury goods, medical instruments, and pharmaceuticals industries.
EC citizens are allowed to enter Montecara without a passport and vice versa; a national identity card that states citizenship is sufficient. The EC and Montecara have a mutual travel policy that allows citizens of either entity to spend up to 180 days in any 365-day period in the other visa-free for personal or business reasons. Visas are still required to work or study. The EC and Montecara also generally cooperate in judicial affairs, including extradition, the enforcement of arrest warrants, and general police matters.
Defense
Montecara is a member of the Euclean Common Defense Treaty Organization (ECDTO), which it joined at the organization's founding in 1948. It cooperates in ECDTO planning and exercises and allows member states' navies to make regular port calls at its harbor.
Proposed membership
| Ratification of EC Membership Agreement, 1996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To ratify the agreement negotiated by the State of Montecara and the Euclean Community with the aim of securing membership in the Community | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date | June 28, 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes
No
Montecara's last serious attempt to join the EC was made in 1996, when the Colegio and Senate both approved the necessary treaties of accession. When they came to a vote by the Popular Assembly, however, they were defeated by a margin of over 60%.
In the lead-up to the Popular Assembly vote, major trade unions came out strongly against the proposal, arguing that membership in the Community would undermine worker protections and allow an influx of cheap foreign labor into the country. Small entrepreneurs and craftsmen also feared increased competition from abroad, and renters reported concerns about increased housing costs and fewer available units in consequence of mass migration.
The financial sector, on the other hand, was strongly pro-membership, and executives of several prominent banking institutions made public statements to the effect that Montecara would stand to gain far more than it would lose by having essentially unrestricted access to a vast capital market. Many political liberals also supported membership on the basis of heightened international cooperation and the progress of the pan-Euclean project. Students and young people also generally supported membership for several reasons, including the increased ability to live, work, and study abroad.
Positions of EC member states on Montecaran membership
Montecaran membership in the EC was broadly supported by both members of the EC government and the populations of EC member-states. Sitting EC President Smitty Werbenjagerman and members of his cabinet made several visits to Montecara to promote the vote. There were also private discussions in cabinet concerning contracting a marketing firm in Montecara to publish a series of ads on Vimo rail cars, but ultimately the scheme was considered too expensive with not enough potential impact on the vote.
A small group of nations, however, lead by Solstianan President Ine Jensen was strongly opposed to the inclusion of Montecara on the basis of a distrust of the government. Jensen believed that Montecaran membership would lead to the further intrusion of private banking interests at the same time that she was promoting policies in the EC which preferred "diminishing partnership" financing. Privately Jensen referred to Montecaran ascension as a "poison pill" which would lead to a decline in the ability of the market to regulate itself with predicted obstructionism from Montecara.